|
|
|||||||
I'll be updating the original post to keep things organized better. Move your mouse over the image for the updated photo. Comments welcome. Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 6 Weeks Off + 23 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/NoDiet_41weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/NoDiet_41weeks_front.html 41 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 6 Weeks Off + 23 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/0to41weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/0to41weeks_front.html 32 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 16 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/0to32weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/0to32weeks_front.html 28 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 12 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/0to28weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/0to28weeks_front.html 24 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 8 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/0to24weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/0to24weeks_front.html 20 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 4 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_front.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_biceps.html 16 Weeks (12 weeks lifting + 4 weeks off) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/0to16weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/0to16weeks_front.html 12 Weeks of Lifting Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_front.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_biceps.html 8 Weeks of Lifting Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/0to8weeks1.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/0to8weeks3.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/0to8weeks2.html 4 Weeks of Lifitng Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/0to4weeks3.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/0to4weeks1.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/0to4weeks2.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Doin any cardio? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: RedACR Doin any cardio? Yes, my routine has been weights on Monday - Wednesday - Friday and cardio on Tuesday & Thursday. Cardio consists of either 1 hour of elliptical or 50 minutes of treadmill @ 5mph. I've also been really watching my calories and keeping them at 1500 - 1600 per day...except on the weekends I slip here and there, but really strict Monday - Friday. And on the weekends I may have 1 bad meal on Saturday and one on Sunday, while still being strict for say breakfast and lunch. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah...you need to be patient. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
lol 4 weeks Come back in 6 months and compare them. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hah...I was half expecting everyone come in and say "Dude you need to change something up, it looks like you havent been doing anything" so in a way it's encouraging that everyone is sayings it's too early. 6 months is my goal (though I plan on going indefinitely) for an actual body transformation but I'd like to see some progress along the way of course...maybe at 3 months it'll be noticeable. Either way I guess I can just use this thread to keep on ongoing blog on the progress. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy 6 months is my goal (though I plan on going indefinitely) for an actual body transformation but I'd like to see some progress along the way of course...maybe at 3 months it'll be noticeable. Either way I guess I can just use this thread to keep on ongoing blog on the progress. You're not going to see a "transformation" in 6 months. Progress sure. The only people that see a "transformation" are those looking to cut a lot of weight. Because, surprise surprise, cutting 20lbs of fat actually isn't that hard over 6 months. If you commit. 4 weeks is nothing. Honestly it's amazing people expect much in 4 weeks. Unless you're going biggest loser and coming from grossly out of shape and then training 4+ hours a day with a trainer and working with a dietician. That said, you can see great progress in 2-3 months, but it's incremental. It's not like you'll have washboards and 2" bigger arms one day. Your generall persona as shown on the forums tend to be pretty much "I want it all and I want it now". That's not how the body works, you've got to work at it alot. P.s. after 4 weeks you need to be going faster the 5mph. Push yourself. Oh and unless you have knee/feet problems ditch the elipical. I'm not saying this based on looks, but it just sounds pretty lax. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
To soon Jr |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Is there a difference? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I can definitely tell a difference. Look at the thickness of your upper chest and your shoulders in the side profile pic. Dude, just keep at it. Are you doing compound lifts and free weights? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole I can definitely tell a difference. Look at the thickness of your upper chest and your shoulders in the side profile pic. Dude, just keep at it. Are you doing compound lifts and free weights? Good observation, I guess from that side profile pic, you can tell a difference. I am definitely getting stronger so I know something is happening. My leg press is up by 50lbs and my bench press is up by 40lbs (sounds more impressive than it is...I am still only benching 73% of my body weight 3 sets 10x each flat bench) and I can do 3 full chin-ups (couldn't even do one when I started 4 weeks ago). I'm doing a mix of excercises...basically... Legs: Hack Squats Seated Calf Raises Incline Leg Press Back: Narrow underhand lat pulldown Wide overhand lat pulldown Chest: Decline Bench Flat Bench Incline Bench Biceps: Standing Barbell Curls Seated Scott Curls Concentration Curls Shoulders: Military Press Lateral Raises Front Dumbell Raises Triceps: Seated Overhead Extensions Cable Pulldowns I do them... Monday Wednesday Friday ...in the order that you see above...the ones listed only twice I repeat Monday's on Friday. For legs I do 5 sets, for back I do 4 sets and for everything else I do 3 sets. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Dude, instead of hack squats do a real barbell squat, even if you cannot do much weight. Just go really low and explode out of the bottom using your ass and hamstrings. Not only will this get rid if the chicken legs, it will give you a huge boost in fat loss and also overall testosterone which will make all of your muscle grow faster. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Wait, you do all that stuff each time you go to the gym? Oh shit. Would it be possible to go 5 times a week for less time? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole Dude, instead of hack squats do a real barbell squat, even if you cannot do much weight. Just go really low and explode out of the bottom using your ass and hamstrings. Not only will this get rid if the chicken legs, it will give you a huge boost in fat loss and also overall testosterone which will make all of your muscle grow faster. The bolded part is false, but I still agree with you. Everyone should do squats. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You don't think doing heavy squats will make your body produce more test? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Squats work the largest muscles in your body which will in turn release the most hormones including testosterone. Am I also missing something? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
4 weeks? come back in 4 yrs |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole You don't think doing heavy squats will make your body produce more test? Scientifically speaking, I've never seen it substantiated anywhere that the minor increase in testosterone leads to more overall growth everywhere. I've seen it scientifically debunked, but never supported to a statistically significant level. It seems to be more of a localized effect than anything. Though, again, I stress that I'm not disagreeing fundamentally. Squats are awesome and absolutely should be done for a number of very, very good reasons. From all the research I've done, increased testosterone for ancillary mass building just isn't one of them. Edit: http://jap.physiology.org/content/108/1/60.full http://gradworks.umi.com/34/32/3432479.html And this guy is such a fucking goof, but he's right on (and coincides with the above study) with #4: http://www.scoobysworkshop.com/squats.htm |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Could be. Either way they rock. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole Wait, you do all that stuff each time you go to the gym? Oh shit. Would it be possible to go 5 times a week for less time? I don't do all the stuff listed every time I go...I do one of each from each group...so for example Monday would look like... Legs: Hack squats x 5 sets x 12 reps Back: Close underhand lat pulldown x 4 sets x 12 reps Chest: Decline bench x 3 sets x 10 reps Biceps: Standing barbell curls x 3 sets x 10 reps Shoulders: Military Press x 3 sets x 10 reps Triceps: Seated Extensions x 3 sets x 10 reps It takes right around one hour to complete and the routine came from the advice of Silock and a site he recommended for the most effective exercises (though I think they recommended regular squats, no hack squats). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole Could be. Either way they rock. Agreed! And to clarify: I'm also not saying that they don't contribute to building muscle in places other than your legs. They do. For instance, heavy squats work your shoulders, too, due to having to stabilize the weight. They work your core better than just about any other exercise (save perhaps the deadlift), and certainly better than crunches or planks or any of those things. It's just not the increased testosterone that's doing it -- it's the hard work of lifting heavy shit and stabilizing it in 3 planes of motion. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole Dude, instead of hack squats do a real barbell squat, even if you cannot do much weight. Just go really low and explode out of the bottom using your ass and hamstrings. That's how low you're supposed to go with squats? On the hack squat machine, I go to 90º at my knees and back up, it's hard a fuck but I really feel it in my quads. I don't really it does much for my hamstrings or ass...but that's where the incline leg press comes in on Fridays...with that I go where my thighs are almost touching my chest and I really feel that in my hamstrings and ass. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy (though I think they recommended regular squats, no hack squats). There's a reason for that |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: FireInTheWhole Dude, instead of hack squats do a real barbell squat, even if you cannot do much weight. Just go really low and explode out of the bottom using your ass and hamstrings. That's how low you're supposed to go with squats? On the hack squat machine, I go to 90º at my knees and back up, it's hard a fuck but I really feel it in my quads. I don't really it does much for my hamstrings or ass...but that's where the incline leg press comes in on Fridays...with that I go where my thighs are almost touching my chest and I really feel that in my hamstrings and ass. Combine the two and do it like you're supposed to. Squats aren't just a quad exercise. You should be feeling it in your core, groin, hamstrings, ass, quads, calves and a few other places. The way you're doing it isn't working your core at all, and not giving you enough overall stimulation in your lower body to really develop the muscles. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Watch all the videos this guy does: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq8CWv8UPAI |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hey! Wait a second...I knew there was a reason I was doing hack squats... http://suppversity.blogspot.com/2011/08/suppversity-emg-series-gluteaus-maximus.html The most effective exercises with standard equipment: Hack squats, lying on machine, 50° knee angle Hack squats, lying on machine, 90° knee angle Squats, barbell, 70° knee angle 45° leg press, 90° knee angle Squats, barbell, 90° knee angle Squats, barbell, 40° knee angle Image 2: Turns out the hack squat is the most effective exercise. In that, going deep (50° knee angle) is only slightly more taxing on the quads than the standard and much safer 90° knee angle. While the EMG activity of the quads may be marginally improved in the case of the hack squat (+0.38%), doing one's squats "ass to the ground", as some people like to call it, actually reduces the quad activity by -10.34%. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Right, but the squat isn't JUST about quad activation. There's much more to it than that. Core activation (both abs and lower back) and strengthening and total leg development. You aren't a bodybuilder, so there's no need for you to just focus on quad development. You need to be doing real squats. You're missing out on everything else. That article also points to the traditional squat as the #1 most effective, recommended exercise. He doesn't recommend going past parallel, but I think he's completely wrong about that, as he doesn't actually back that up with any studies or real data. Don't major in the minors. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah, hacks are great for quads and quads only. They barely work the ass and hams at all. Legs days I do a little something like this with some of the things switched out and around every few weeks. -Warm up consists of 2 sets of bodyweight squats, 2 sets of 135 squats, one set of like 225, then one rep of the weight I am going to be starting with so I can get acclimated to the weight. -4 sets of squats -2 sets of deep single leg squats with my back leg on a weight bench and holding dumbells -4 sets of calves. I do these right her to give my major leg muscles a rest for a bit. -2 sets of stiff leg deadlifts -2 sets of hack squats -2 sets of those inny things on the machine and then 2 sets of the outies. LOL I don't know what they call them, but they work your groin muscles and your hips and glutes. -If I have anything left I will throw 135 on the squat again and just rep out as many as I can, but I rarely have enough juice left to do this. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Monday will be 8 weeks since I started lifting and I will be taking some new pictures then, but in the mean time, I decided to look through some older pictures from this year before I started on my diet. I may be getting a little bit too into this but it's kind of fun. I've made a couple mouseover sites with progress and I'll keep these going as I progress, with notes to help me keep track of things at the bottom of each page. First I have my pre-diet to dieting/4 weeks of lifting comparison: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/190to187.html Then after dieting/cardio for a couple months (no lifting) to 4 weeks of lifting: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/0to4weeks1.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I see zero difference between those two pics, except a lack of body hair. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock I see zero difference between those two pics, except a lack of body hair. Did you see the newest reply I made (directly above yours) with the links? http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/190to187.html http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/0to4weeks1.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah, that's what I was looking at. You probably see the difference, though, considering you look at yourself every day. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: [OB11BO ]I see some minor differences. But lifting takes more time. Also, I suspect your diet is slowing you down. 8 weeks should have gotten you a lot of weight down. What have you lost? Honestly, nothing, which I'm finding very weird. It used to be fairly easy for me to drop 1.5lbs per week but since I've started lifting and keeping my calories at 1500/day I literally haven't dropped in weight...hell this morning I'm actually heavier than I was 8 weeks ago. I was 187.0 this morning compared to 186.1 8 weeks ago. I'm noticing a difference though...a little bit in looks but more in how my body feels, it feels tighter...but as flabby and my wife says she can definitely see a chance so I guess I'll just keep on going. What I always wonder is...what the hell would happen if I didn't watch everything I ate? Damn. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
If I go to 1000-1100 per day, I don't think I can still meet the protein needs. As is with 1500 calories I get about 145g of protein per day. I usually do take a day or two (usually Saturday and/or Sunday) where I am not as strict with my diet, I'll have one "bad" meal. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy If I go to 1000-1100 per day, I don't think I can still meet the protein needs. As is with 1500 calories I get about 145g of protein per day. I usually do take a day or two (usually Saturday and/or Sunday) where I am not as strict with my diet, I'll have one "bad" meal. Just my severely limited opinion... But what are you actuall doing when you work out? If you can run 50 @ 5 miles, get off the damn eliptical. If your body can take the impact elipticals are normally a way to slack. Get your heart rate up. And if you can do 50@5mph, push yourself to get faster. 12 minute miles aren't exactly going to melt the fat off. Sure slow and steady eats calories up, but if you can get your heart rate up you'll have longer burn. The goal should be something like 1 hour at about 7+mph. There's no reason a 30 y/o @ sub 190 shouldn't be able to work towards that. Start by doing 5-10minutes at a time at 6mph, and alternate. Even soft intervals will get your cardio system more active. Oh and get a plan on weights. I'll admit I'm no expert here, but I've always had a plan at least. Honestly I think you're not pushing yourself enough. That said, 8 weeks still isn't that long. But for how few calories your on I would have expected to see more results that a 1/2 inch in your belly and no weight loss. How much are you "cheating" on weekends and the bad meal? Is the one "bad" meal 1200 calories? I've never been a dieter, but it seem everyone I know with diet problems cheats too much. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
did you just eat 40oz of chicken all day or what? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta But what are you actuall doing when you work out? If you can run 50 @ 5 miles, get off the damn eliptical. If your body can take the impact elipticals are normally a way to slack. I haven't done the elliptical or treadmill in a while...my most recent workouts consist of lifting weights on M-W-F and hiking on T-TH. The hiking is 3.5 miles with an elevation change of 800 ft and I do it in an hour. Quote: Honestly I think you're not pushing yourself enough. That said, 8 weeks still isn't that long. But for how few calories your on I would have expected to see more results that a 1/2 inch in your belly and no weight loss. It is true, I could definitely push myself a lot more and do cardio that is a lot more effective than hiking, such as running (my heart rate monitor says I burn about 700 calories when I run for an hour vs 450 calories for hiking) but I absolutely *hate* running...I mean hate it the first minute into the hour run and I've found I need to like what I'm doing if I actually want to be consistent. I've tried running and after a week or two, I just stop going. I'm comfortable with the idea that it will 6+ months to get where I want vs 3 months that it could take. Quote: How much are you "cheating" on weekends and the bad meal? Is the one "bad" meal 1200 calories? Depends, for example on Saturday I did well all day bit for dinner I had a NY Strip steak with cornbread and grilled veggies, it was awesome. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Nealoc187 did you just eat 40oz of chicken all day or what? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Week 8 update photos are up. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric Originally Posted By: Nealoc187 did you just eat 40oz of chicken all day or what? Yeah I wasn't asking with regard to possible diet for myself, I was just trying to do the math and figure out if that was basically all he ate all day. I know I need carbs and calories for my goals. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: [OB11BO ] Lunch I had 12oz of lean chcien breast 330cals, 75Gs Where are you getting your nutritional information for chicken breast? My search on Google says 12oz of chicken breast is 552 calories and 108g of protein. http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/poultry-products/703/2 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You need to work on your diet, man. After 8 weeks, I'd have expected to see more progress on the gut. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Damn that's pretty good. I just had lunch...a ham sandwich and it was 310 calories and 30g of protein. So far for the day I'm at 760 calories and 74g of protein. I've had oatmeal/skim milk/protein powder for breakfast and the sandwich for lunch. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
My biggest problem to my diet is bread. I freaking love it but it's so worthless, almost no protein and a crapload of calories. I'm probably getting 500-600 calories per day from just bread. A friend of mine was funny...he's like "Dude, you're Romanian! You were born with bread in your hand." So fucking true...I eat bread with EVERYTHING, the food doesn't taste right to me unless I'm having bread with it...steak, grilled chicken, mashed potatoes...gotta have bread. I have to make a change though because obviously it's not enough with what I'm doing. I'm going to cut down to 1200 calories per day for the next 4 weeks and then see how my 12 week update looks. I had another sandwich about 30 minutes ago but this time I used 1 slice of bread vs 2, a bit more lunch meat and had some Romaine lettuce with it...215 calories and 30g of protein vs 310 calories and 30g earlier. And you're right, I sit in a chair most of the day aside from the gym...and I work from home. I'd say 4/5 days, I walk from my bed to the computer at 9am and almost don't get up at all until around 5pm (aside from bathroom and to eat/drink)...then I go to the gym for an hour then back home I'm on the couch or in bed. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
So, you have a problem and you know what it is? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYLMTvxOaeE&feature=related |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hah...yea, pretty much...but I'm going to do something about it. Today I had 1255 calories & 158g of protein. I am starving though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Dude...just suck it up and run. There's a reason it hurts and you dont want to do it....that's because it's work. Losing weight isnt easy....but running is by far one of the most effective ways to do it. I speak from experience. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I am doing other activities such as hiking, 2-3 time per week, on the days that I'm not lifting (3 times per week). It may not be as good as running calorie burning wise, but I really enjoy it. Plus, like I've mentioned, I'm cutting my calories to 1200/day. I'll update again at 12 weeks. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
If you refuse to run, at least go bike riding or play a sport. I'm a fan of doing more than just light cardio - though it's not necessary. It's just nice to be in shape. As for bread, buy some good multigrain bread or flax bread. 100 calories per slice, 5-6 grams of protien, 5 grams of fibre. Just have a slice with lunch/dinner and limit it to that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I love hiking too, but unless your spending 6 hours a day really humping it, its not gonna do shot. You need to go anaerobic every single day. You have lots of great trails near you...start running them. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Anaerobic, as in "hardcore training" according this this chart? Why not the Weight control (Fitness/Fat burn) zone? With the hiking, wearing my heart rate monitor, I average 125 bpm over 50 minutes with a max of 160 bpm. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The zone thing is fucking retarded. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock The zone thing is fucking retarded. Haha, insightful. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock The zone thing is fucking retarded. Agreed...ditch the heart rate monitor! By anaerobic I'm simply saying you need to get your body to the point of where your heart is beating fast and you're sucking wind. OB1 is right....you're overthinking it. Get out there and make yourself suffer...it's he only way. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Have to agree. We might be more hardcore than most here, but certainly jogging/biking isn't that hard. You just have to open the door and go. If it gets tough, take a breather, reload and go. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Why not the Weight control (Fitness/Fat burn) zone? With the hiking, wearing my heart rate monitor, I average 125 bpm over 50 minutes with a max of 160 bpm. Average 185 for an hour or two. You'll lose weight. Also, I'll add that "weight control" has a hidden meaning: "don't get anymore fat but don't lose anything either" And if you're doing that you're lucky. This is why you see fat people on ellipticals. It's easy and doesn't do much. /uneducated opinion on all this garbage. To be honest, you sound like Prog. Just making excuses and seeing shit results. Work hard, do shit you don't like because it actually pays off. And who knows, maybe you'll come to love running. I hated HATED running at one point in my life. Now I love it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mr. Mom Originally Posted By: Silock The zone thing is fucking retarded. Agreed...ditch the heart rate monitor! By anaerobic I'm simply saying you need to get your body to the point of where your heart is beating fast and you're sucking wind. OB1 is right....you're overthinking it. Get out there and make yourself suffer...it's he only way. Yep, Just fucking workout hard. If you need a heart rate monitor to tell you what hard is, fine get oone. But basically you're in the lower regions of your fancy chart. Sure you're burning some calories while your on the machine. But you're not making yourself fitter. If you push yourself you'll burn a ton of calories even after your workout. Or if you're going to be a pussy, up your time on "cardio". Not many people stay fat at anything over 20 miles a week on their feet(some elipticals count both part of the revolution though, one more reason they're bullshit). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You guys are more hardcore than most on here and while I agree with you in principle, what I've learned about myself over years and years is that I do better at a slower pace than at a faster pace because I simply don't do it. I know I should, but I hate it and end up giving up. I just work better if I can do something I like at least somewhat and it takes 6 months to do vs doing something I hate and doing it in 3 months. I'll be upfront and I know you guys will do a but as I type this on my iPad, I'm on the elliptical and my heart rate is at 132 bpm but I don't hate it. Sure I could be on the treadmill and be at 158 bpm but I would do that for about two days and stop, I've tried it. I've lost 55lbs before so I'm not totally new at this. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy You guys are more hardcore than most on here and while I agree with you in principle, what I've learned about myself over years and years is that I do better at a slower pace than at a faster pace because I simply don't do it. I know I should, but I hate it and end up giving up. I just work better if I can do something I like at least somewhat and it takes 6 months to do vs doing something I hate and doing it in 3 months. I'll be upfront and I know you guys will do a but as I type this, I'm on the elliptical and my heart rate is at 132 bpm but I don't hate it. Sure I could be on the treadmill and be at 158 bpm but I would do that for about two days and stop, I've tried it. Can you do treadmill at a slower pace to get you used to it? Even as a runner, if I'm more than 1-2 weeks off of running I find my first few runs awkward and tiring. All of the sudden it clicks again. Can you run once a week as a challenge to yourself? Shit sign up for a spring 5k race. It's only 3 miles and you'll have to get yourself ready for it. And if you refuse to run, got harder on the elliptical. Do some intervals once a week or something. On the other days, go longer. I mean you've admitted your not committed to results, fine. But for your health you still need to push yourself. Also, consider a trainer. Some people just need that extrinsic motivation. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You continue to do the easy stuff, because that's what it is....easy. I'm not hardcore by any means...I just put the time and effort. I never really liked the idea of going out and making myself suffer, but once I was out there it felt good. Believe it or not, your body wants you to push it to the limit. It rewards you by letting it feel a bit easier the next time. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
looking good man. It's a very obvious improvement |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's not that running is all that tiring, that isn't what I don't like about it. What I don't like is that I'm panting the whole time and hating life. I get a little dizzy...time seems to move backwards, I look at the clock literally every 45 seconds and it feels like 5 minutes. And I didn't say I'm not committed to results, I'm saying that I think there can be a middle ground where it takes longer to get the results vs all or nothing that many people on here seem to preach. Right now I'm doing 1200 calories and the 3 days liftting & 3 days elliptical/hiking. I'll see how that goes over the next 4 weeks and adjust then if needed. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Instead of hiking your hike, jog it. When you're out of breath and feel shitty, I would alternate resting and powering through it - rinse/repeat. It's called getting into shape. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impulsive Instead of hiking your hike, jog it. When you're out of breath and feel shitty, I would alternate resting and powering through it - rinse/repeat. That is actually what I have been doing...jogging the flat/downhill areas and hiking the inclines. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Joeyballs looking good man. It's a very obvious improvement Thanks man...fiiinally someone says something positive. Yes, I do much better with positive reinforcement. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy It's not that running is all that tiring, that isn't what I don't like about it. What I don't like is that I'm panting the whole time and hating life. I get a little dizzy...time seems to move backwards, I look at the clock literally every 45 seconds and it feels like 5 minutes. News flash....that's called getting tired! You're panting because you're tired and out of shape! The problem people have with running is that there's no faking it. With hiking, eliptical, cycling....you get out of it what you put into it. You aren't seeing results because you're not pushing yourself. We're not hating on you at all...think of it as tough love. We want to see you succeed! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Val I don't know you for shit but sign up for a 5k and I'll drive to the valley and run it with you. I'm all about trying to motivate people to push thrmselves out of their comfort zone because I know without someone pushing you it's hard to want to improve or stay motivated. I swear one organized 5k and you'll feel pumpd afterwards and see how fun running can be, even at 12min/mile pace. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy You guys are more hardcore than most on here and while I agree with you in principle, what I've learned about myself over years and years is that I do better at a slower pace than at a faster pace because I simply don't do it. I know I should, but I hate it and end up giving up. I just work better if I can do something I like at least somewhat and it takes 6 months to do vs doing something I hate and doing it in 3 months. I'll be upfront and I know you guys will do a but as I type this on my iPad, I'm on the elliptical and my heart rate is at 132 bpm but I don't hate it. Sure I could be on the treadmill and be at 158 bpm but I would do that for about two days and stop, I've tried it. I've lost 55lbs before so I'm not totally new at this. Don't take this the wrong way, but it sounds like you just want to put in the minimum amount of effort and have the results you'd get from putting in more effort. And there's nothing wrong with that, per se. I don't like going to the gym more often than I have to. I don't like doing exercises that aren't going to help me as much as others. But when you are in the gym or working out, you need to WORK. It's not going to feel good. You have to become comfortable with being uncomfortable. Embrace the pain and use it to push yourself. I think you'd do much better with the cardio if you switched to playing a sport, or did HIIT for 20-30 minutes, 5 times a week. Sample beginner workout: 5 minute warm-up jog (half of your maximum pace) 20 second sprint, 40 seconds jog (back down to warm-up pace) x 15 sets 5 minute cooldown jog (somewhere less than your jogging pace, but not a walk) __________ During the sprints, SPRINT. Go as fast as you can. Don't hold back. You'll get enough rest during the jogging phases. And you may not get 100% of your breath back during your "rest" interval. That's okay. It's supposed to be hard and taxing. But really aren't doing more than a few minutes of all-out work. I think you would like something like this if you tried it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy It's not that running is all that tiring, that isn't what I don't like about it. What I don't like is that I'm panting the whole time and hating life. I get a little dizzy...time seems to move backwards, I look at the clock literally every 45 seconds and it feels like 5 minutes. And I didn't say I'm not committed to results, I'm saying that I think there can be a middle ground where it takes longer to get the results vs all or nothing that many people on here seem to preach. Right now I'm doing 1200 calories and the 3 days liftting & 3 days elliptical/hiking. I'll see how that goes over the next 4 weeks and adjust then if needed. Your panting because your lungs suck. They get stronger, like any muscle. You've got to give them a reason to. Work your lungs out by getting off that leisurely 128bpm heart rate. Try to run occasionally, but start slow. Like I said, I can't go out and click off my 5k pace if I haven't run at all in 3 weeks. I'm not hardcore, I suck at most things athletic. I just know that it takes some hard work to get in shape or to make it to a goal. So I work hard. I'm slow as shit for a runner, but I still run my ass off. Shit I smoked for 5 years of my life and off and on for another 2, I've never been what anyone would call an athlete. But I know I could go run a half marathon next week and I turn 31 on Sunday. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I wouldnt ditch the heart rate monitor...that is silly advice. well by that I mean...he shouldnt just not care about his hr. though at the same time you dont need to be monitoring it every second. checking in every little bit on what your HR is is a very good tool to use. Just do the old fashioned way. look at the clock and count your beats for 6 or 10 seconds..first beat is zero. (fingers on neck or wrist) a proper training regimen will touch all those "zones" at different times. last night i was in and out of anaerobic training and dipping into vo2 max. other days im near the anaerobic threshold. it totally depends. obviously with plenty lower hr work in the mix. and aerobic work on other days. progress looks good.. you just have to keep at it. keep in mind a lot of the jacked guys posting didnt just pick up a weight 8 weeks ago. they have been doing this on/off for years |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy It's not that running is all that tiring, that isn't what I don't like about it. What I don't like is that I'm panting the whole time and hating life. I get a little dizzy...time seems to move backwards, I look at the clock literally every 45 seconds and it feels like 5 minutes. id also switch it up and walk the downhill..run the up hill. running downstairs/down a hill is a lot harder on your muscles and not necessarily in a good way. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock You have to become comfortable with being uncomfortable. love the pain |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric id also switch it up and walk the downhill..run the up hill. running downstairs/down a hill is a lot harder on your muscles and not necessarily in a good way. I agree with this. I run a lot of hills, uphill might be harder in terms of work, but the downhill jarring/pounding bothers me more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impulsive Originally Posted By: Euphoric id also switch it up and walk the downhill..run the up hill. running downstairs/down a hill is a lot harder on your muscles and not necessarily in a good way. I agree with this. I run a lot of hills, uphill might be harder in terms of work, but the downhill jarring/pounding bothers me more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
So apparently going to 1200 - 1250 calories per day (from 1550 - 1600) does work. Was 186.8 on Monday this week (5th dot from the end) and 183.3 this morning and the lightest by 2.1lbs in the past 3 weeks (and actually the last time I was 183.3 or lower was May of 2010). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric Originally Posted By: Impulsive Originally Posted By: Euphoric id also switch it up and walk the downhill..run the up hill. running downstairs/down a hill is a lot harder on your muscles and not necessarily in a good way. I agree with this. I run a lot of hills, uphill might be harder in terms of work, but the downhill jarring/pounding bothers me more. Downhill requires more muscles. Eccentric contractions. While you may feel more tired up, you'll probably be more sore and develop more muscular strength going up. But it can also be murder on the joints if you're not taking small fast strides. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Guy from the other thread is killing you Val, time to pick up the pace! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: [OB11BO I eat the fuck out of these on weeks I'm too lazy to cook the chicken. Thawed out in the fridge and 2min in the microwave and done. 98% fat free, nearly 4oz in every fillet. http://www.tyson.com/Products/Grilled-And-Ready-Fully-Cooked-Frozen-Chicken-Breast-Fillets.aspx 24Gs and 110cals per fillet. Drown 2-3 of these....6 of them is under 700cals and right around 150Gs. I eat about that and a couple shakes minimum a day. That is about 900cals and 200G's and I still have a couple 100cals to spare when I'm cutting. When not cutting I still wrap this same list around more cals... Thanks for the suggestion on these, I picked up a pack at Costco yesterday and am looking forward to having some for lunch today. Interestingly though they changes the nutritional information on the label though from the link you posted above. It now says a serving size is 3oz (vs 1 Fillet) and that has 110 calories and 22g of protein. I weighed one of the bigger pieces in the bag though and it wasn't even 3oz so maybe that's why they changed it. I'm going to program it into my food scale and it should be easy to keep track when I'm having a meal. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
HX, don't gauge your weight from evening to morning after a sleep. You can lose a couple pounds throughout the night just from water vapor through mouth breathing. I wouldn't fuss about taking your weight daily as you will become too obsessed. Take it every few days, couple times a week. Make sure it's at a consistent time with proper hydration. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Back 5 HX, don't gauge your weight from evening to morning after a sleep. I don't do that, did I give the impression that I do? I do weigh myself every day, but always first thing in the morning when I wake up (around 8:30am), naked, and after a piss. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: Back 5 HX, don't gauge your weight from evening to morning after a sleep. I don't do that, did I give the impression that I do? I do weigh myself every day, but always first thing in the morning when I wake up (around 8:30am), naked, and after a piss. Sorry, from the way I read your post it looked like you had a reading before bed and when you woke up. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: [OB11BO Bought one last night and weighed a larger and smaller piece....3.95 and 3.45 (for lunch just now). WTF...did you buy it from Costco? I must have got the special pack or something because I just pulled out the bag out of the freezer and weighed like 10 different pieces. The heaviest was 2.7oz and the ranged as low as 1.9oz. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yea we usually have a couple containers of cottage cheese in the fridge, my wife loves the stuff...I think it's ok, not too bad...I'm more of a meat person. This is the only stuff she likes though, but it's similar to what you posted, 100 cal/14g protein. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Downhill requires more muscles. Eccentric contractions. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
12 Week Update So today is week #12 since I started doing doing weights 3x per week without missing a single week. I weighed in at 180.0lbs this morning which is down from my high of 194.2 back in May 2011 and my lightest weight since May 2010. I've dropped 6.8lbs in the last 4 weeks by dropping my calories down to 1200 per day (from ~1700 before). Strength is really where I am noticing a difference. A few that I'm liking... Leg press: 180lbs -> 270lbs (5 sets x 12 reps) Chin ups: 0.5 (yes, half, couldn't even do one) -> 7.0 Lat pulldown: 90lbs -> 140lbs (4 sets x 12 reps) Standing Barbel Curls: 60lbs -> 80lbs (3 sets x 10 reps) Here's the photos...comment away. BTW, this forum is really helping me stay motivated so I really appreciate everyone's help and advice (even if I don't always listen to it ). This weekend I was trying to be extra strict knowing I had to take photos and do an update here today so that helps me out. Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/NoDiet_12weeks_Side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/NoDiet_12weeks.html 12 Weeks of Lifting Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_front.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week12/0to12weeks_biceps.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
*Crickets* Where is everyone? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'll say what I said earlier. You were expecting too much at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Now your seeing your rewards? & chins is good. I seem to have plateued at 7 pulls and it's annoying the piss out of me. But I'm just going on your reported strength gains. I don't like to look at men without their shirts at work... I save that for home |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Oh, and from your side I can see you're either sucking in or suffering from weak core. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Now your seeing your rewards? & chins is good. I seem to have plateued at 7 pulls and it's annoying the piss out of me. I was able to do 8 today, felt good because that was one that messed with my mind...not even being able to do one when I started, felt "unmanly" in a way. I've been able to add an additional one every Monday more or less, I'm sure I'll plateau here sooner or later. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Oh, and from your side I can see you're either sucking in or suffering from weak core. I knew I should have touched on this as someone was bound to mention it. My wife said the same thing, she thought I was sucking it in but I'm not, that's just how I look when I stand up straight. So it's because of a weak core? How can you tell...like what specifically are you looking at? What should I do to improve this area? All I'm doing that is working out the core area now are squats. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Now your seeing your rewards? & chins is good. I seem to have plateued at 7 pulls and it's annoying the piss out of me. I was able to do 8 today, felt good because that was one that messed with my mind...not even being able to do one when I started, felt "unmanly" in a way. I've been able to add an additional one every Monday more or less, I'm sure I'll plateau here sooner or later. I was chugging along on Chins and they switched to Pulls as I wanted to really get the lats(then again i could use the biceps help too). Maybe I'll work on chins again to make progress. Good job though. You've made a ton of progress. I've only gone from 3 clean ones chins to 8 before I switched. 0(ish) to 7 is good progress! Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Oh, and from your side I can see you're either sucking in or suffering from weak core. I knew I should have touched on this as someone was bound to mention it. My wife said the same thing, she thought I was sucking it in but I'm not, that's just how I look when I stand up straight. So it's because of a weak core? How can you tell...like what specifically are you looking at? What should I do to improve this area? All I'm doing that is working out the core area now are squats. Like you said, it looks like you're sucking in. That collapse under your ribs. Now don't get me wrong, I have a huge core for my strength/weight. Genetics a bit, it's where I store my fat too. Plus a bit of a posture issue(stick my ass and my gut out). But most guys shouldn't collapse like that. Even when I ran a lot and weighed 10lbs I wouldn't dip in that much. I mean it's less support. I've been down to a 30" waist in jeans and never had that sort of profile. Don't fuck around with fancy with core(my new theory). Your squats are a good start, but add some planks. 3 long planks. Try 3 1minute ones, focus on squeezing your ass and staying flat. I occasionally do some decline sit-ups, but people have a habit of using their hip flexors(not curling abdomen), and just V at the waist. That and use your abs while doing others. Bench, any above the head press, those recruit the abs a lot if you'r doing them right. But doing some core like this may make you look not quite as lean in clothes. I know you've commented people say you look skinny in clothes but feel fat. I find using a routine with the big compounds and some planks I have the opposite. My core cross-section is much bigger than it used to be, so I fill a shirt more. But I have more definition and it actually helps support my chest. My wife says the bigger around isn't a problem because I'm bigger everywhere. p.s. Art hates it when newbs act like experts, and I hate bitchfests with him. I should clarify that I'm pretty novice at all this to. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hmm...I have never done planks, had no idea what they even were until I did a search on Google which brought up this YouTube video. Good video to follow? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiA9j-dR0oM Seems awfully easy, though I've never even tried it so I'll probably be surprised. So just 3x 1min? Once per week or more? Edit: Ok, so I just did one and crap that's not easy. I was able to do 1 min. but was shaking by the end. Really felt it in my core area but also my arms were getting pretty tired from it. I doubt I can do 3x 1 min but I'll do how much I can. Edit again: Alright, so I was able to do 3 but I was shaking and breathing heavy like a mofo, who would of thought something so simple can give you that good of a work out. So how many times per week should I be doing this and when should I increase the time, or should I increase the reps? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Hmm...I have never done planks, had no idea what they even were until I did a search on Google which brought up this YouTube video. Good video to follow? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiA9j-dR0oM Seems awfully easy, though I've never even tried it so I'll probably be surprised. So just 3x 1min? Once per week or more? Edit: Ok, so I just did one and crap that's not easy. I was able to do 1 min. but was shaking by the end. Really felt it in my core area but also my arms were getting pretty tired from it. I doubt I can do 3x 1 min but I'll do how much I can. Edit again: Alright, so I was able to do 3 but I was shaking and breathing heavy like a mofo, who would of thought something so simple can give you that good of a work out. So how many times per week should I be doing this and when should I increase the time, or should I increase the reps? Haha, i love your edits. Yeah, when Art advised 3x1 I was like, more! He said go for 3x2min. That first day I did 3x75 seconds and I was dieing. I'm upto 3x100 on a good day or 3x90seconds most. And I still hate them. Murderously harder than they look. Shaking, breathing hard, etc. I think Art advised 3 times a week for me. Generally on weights days(when they're already a bit tired). That way they get a bit of rest on cardio days(though sprints are a very good ab workout due to hip twist). i don't know if reps vs time matters too much. i've been increasing time because that actually seems harder. There's a point where you want to just quit. Pushing past that makes you mentally stronger at least. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Fuck all that noise. Heavy squats and heavy deadlifts. I didn't see you mention deads. With all that, any plank or other core work is just extraneous and not really necessary. Do it if you want, though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 I agree that squats and deads and some weighted situps are really all I'm needing to work those areas. BUT...when I was doing pullups I just added weight and tried for one more each week. When I reached 10 pullups I added weight. When I quit doing them a month ago I had 35lbs on there with 6 pullups (starting another process to 10). For what its worth. I'm pretty sure Val's been told 100 times to do the big lifts but he still seems to focus on leg press, etc. I figured I'd at least offer him some tools to complement his routine. I feel like most peole end up cheating with weighted core routine. They use their hip flexor muscles rather than truly contracting their abs. though I suppose with weight you'd have to have some strength there. How often do you do pulls? I find that with the tweaked SS art reommended I'm either fresh of Rows or Deads and I'm already a bit tired for pulls. It's frustrating the piss out of me. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta I'm pretty sure Val's been told 100 times to do the big lifts but he still seems to focus on leg press, etc. I figured I'd at least offer him some tools to complement his routine. I do squats as well, not just leg press. Squats on Monday and leg press on Friday. I don't know, I like doing the leg press and feel it works my glutes the best. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
dunno man, from the front shot, you actually look heaver at week 12 vs. week 4. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta I'm pretty sure Val's been told 100 times to do the big lifts but he still seems to focus on leg press, etc. I figured I'd at least offer him some tools to complement his routine. I do squats as well, not just leg press. Squats on Monday and leg press on Friday. I don't know, I like doing the leg press and feel it works my glutes the best. Fine, if you're following the CSI logic you're probably getting enough core from the big lifts. However you're clearly not following the CSI logic(why does an amateur need more glutes, rather than balanced hamstrings/back/glute/quads?). I'm not really here to debate the core exercises vs the supplementals. I'll leave that to others. My point is, if you're not going to follow the normal prescribed beginner program(some variation of starting strength), the planks are a good way to compliment your routine. Hell I like planks twice a week even with Starting strength. I like how they're hard to cheat and only use your hip flexors(which is why a lot of ab routines never give any washboarding), but still recruite the whole core length(i.e they'll use your hip flexors as well). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Dope! dunno man, from the front shot, you actually look heaver at week 12 vs. week 4. Really? I'm down 7.5 lbs from 8 weeks ago ( 187.5lbs vs 180.0lbs). Here is a mouseover of Week 4 vs Week 12. I think you can see the biggest difference around the waist...the front as well as the hips. http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/week4vs12_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
178.9 this morning! Down 15.3lbs since my heavingest of 194.2 back in May 2011. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Well...I'll show you... As you can see, I wasn't on a diet the whole time. I went from 194.2 to 185.1 then back to 190.9 back to 185.3 then to 189.2 on Oct. 2nd which is when I started to really diet. That big decline you see starting at 186.6 to today is when I cut back to 1200 calories per day. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
BTW, this is what my whole chart looks like since I bought the WiThings scale in on Feb. 20, 2010. Every single day is recorded. The lowest point on there is 176.9 on March 19, 2010 and that is the lowest weight I've ever been that I can actually remember...so probably my lowest since I was 15-16 yrs old (15 years ago). I also wasn't lifting at all, just diet and some cardio so when I reach that same weight and go lower now, I'll be in much better shape than I was then and best shape of my life. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Yeah, when Art advised 3x1 I was like, more! He said go for 3x2min. That first day I did 3x75 seconds and I was dieing. I'm upto 3x100 on a good day or 3x90seconds most. And I still hate them. Murderously harder than they look. Shaking, breathing hard, etc. Hey man, thanks for the sore ribs today...feels like I got punched in both sides, wouldn't surprise me if they turn purple. Thought I would feel sore more in my upper stomach area, but its my bottom most rib on each side that hurts like a mofo. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Yeah, when Art advised 3x1 I was like, more! He said go for 3x2min. That first day I did 3x75 seconds and I was dieing. I'm upto 3x100 on a good day or 3x90seconds most. And I still hate them. Murderously harder than they look. Shaking, breathing hard, etc. Hey man, thanks for the sore ribs today...feels like I got punched in both sides, wouldn't surprise me if they turn purple. Thought I would feel sore more in my upper stomach area, but its my bottom most rib on each side that hurts like a mofo. Haha, I've never given another CSI member a bruise before! Now that you mention it I've noticed I can see my ribs a bit lately(in the morning when I'm 'lean'). I was surprised because I'm probably well above 10% body fat still, I still have a spare tire on the lower abs. The planks (along with the big exercises) are probably to blame someone. I'm not sure, just guessing. Sounds like it's maybe the top of the obliques on you. I know that's one of the beauties of the plank. Even without doing side planks you'll work the obliques. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 15lbs in 7 months? I mean, great you're getting there...but I'm curious as to why you could accomplish that in the first 4-8 weeks. This. Not that it's the right way to go about doing things, but I could easily drop 10-15lbs in 2 weeks just doing a low carb/high protein diet like atkins. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Dope! Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 15lbs in 7 months? I mean, great you're getting there...but I'm curious as to why you could accomplish that in the first 4-8 weeks. This. Not that it's the right way to go about doing things, but I could easily drop 10-15lbs in 2 weeks just doing a low carb/high protein diet like atkins. Did you see my reply afterwards? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 15lbs in 7 months? I mean, great you're getting there...but I'm curious as to why you could accomplish that in the first 4-8 weeks. doubtful |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Week 16 Update A bit of a different update since after the 12 weeks of lifting 3x per week, I took 4 weeks off over the holidays and ate quite a bit. Surprisingly, my weight is actually lower than my Week 12 update (177.4lbs vs 180.0lbs) but I actually think I may have lost a bit of muscle looking at the pictures. Today I am starting a whole new routine, Starting Strength, so it's like a total reset and and sort of a new "Week 0". I'm going to come back and update with my starting weights tonight so it helps me keep track when looking back on this in the future. Here are the update photos, though they really aren't much different than the Week 12 photos, but I might as well be consistent. Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 4 Weeks Off Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/NoDiet_16weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/NoDiet_16weeks_front.html 16 Weeks (12 weeks lifting + 4 weeks off) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/0to16weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week%2016/0to16weeks_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 What is? I lost a pound a day nearly for the first 2 weeks. 3 months concluded 40lbs. Not everyone needs to be that hardcore though... How much did you weigh before? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Height? 40 pounds in 3 months, roughly .45 pounds a day. That's a 1,575 calorie deficit a day, in order to pull that off. What percentage of your weight loss would you attribute to a diet change vs. exercise program? I'd imagine you were doing at least an hour-hour 1/2 of cardio a day? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Don't forget that about 8-10 lbs of that is probably water. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock Don't forget that about 8-10 lbs of that is probably water. Yup. I'm curious how much was exercise vs. diet. I watch some of these "I used to be fat" shows, and it amazes me what some of these people are accomplishing i.e. working out 5-6 hours a day and losing a pound a day. Pretty ridiculous. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'd say that 80% of my weight loss has been purely excercise. There was only a few times where I focused on my diet...the rest of the time I ate what I wanted, just never gorged myself. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Just exercise can go a looooooong way. But, you'll never get below about 15% or so if you aren't watching you diet (unless you're training like Michael Phelps or something). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You're like a totally new different person. You look a lot younger. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Officially 176.7lbs this morning which is my lowest weight since I was probably 15-16 years old (almost 31 now). And it's only Tuesday, I can see that dropping to 176.0 or maybe even lower by the weekend. Graph shows 02/20/10 - 01/10/12, previous low spot was 176.9lbs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Don't want to threadjack but OB, that's an awesome transformation... you look "unhealthy" in the pic where you are the lightest... Good work... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Officially 175.0lbs this morning, and as you can see from the chart, that was my "objective" in my mind when I started the diet...but as many of you said, I would get there and it wouldn't be enough...and sure enough it isn't. The flab is still there...I don't know how light I need to go to get rid of it...165? 155? I'm freaking 6'1"! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Adding on what OB said. HX_Guy, there isn't much muscle under your skin, so all of that is mostly fat. You could easily cut down to the 140's and start building muscle from there. You will look like Christian Bale in the Machinist though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Uh yea, don't want to look like this. Apparenlty we are about the same height...he weighed 121lbs in the movie. Crazy shit. This part of the diet sucks...I like my weight (number) but I'm unhappy with how much fat I still have around my middle section...though my legs and arms are pretty thin (I think) plus my face is starting to look pretty thin which I don't really like. My body composition is shit though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm suprised that's 18.8% Like you've said, you look soft. Sure you're thinner. you want muscle. It's always been what you want. My advice? for what little it's worth? Do your S.S, stop ultra low calorie. Don't go apeshit, but at least to maintenance level. I'm not sure why you ever worried about getting down to 175 while still not lifting hard, building some muscle. Why are you fixated on the scale, focus on how you feel and look. I'm sorry, but I feel like that's such a girl attitude. I've said it before and I'll say it again. height/weight doesn't tell you shit about how someone looks with their clothes off. And Maybe OB1 can enlighten me too. Why if you're not obese, to cut down to some level before building muscle? Especially OB1 who cut down so much below his goal weight(right?) Wouldn't not yo-yoing have been less time, less stress on your body? Plus less extreme on your clothes fit? I'm between you guys in weight/height and lean-ness and I focused on weights first. I feel like being strong was the priority, losing a few lbs(in total) is the end goal. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's not so much that I'm fixated on the number...but when I weighed 194lbs, I thought in my mind that when I get down to 175lbs, I would look drastically different and I don't feel like I do. In the mirror I sort feel like I look the same. I was a fat kid from 9 years old to 20 years old, the worst period in someone's life to be fat I believe so I am a bit obsessed with the fat part of it more than the muscle part...I hate the fat I have around my middle and would probably go the surgery route if I could afford in (not really...I'd be embarrassed to say I had surgery to lose weight, but just saying how much I hate the fat I have). As for losing weight before building muscle, I've heard of this before too. I think the thought is that you can't really gain muscle with such low calories, and you can't lose fat with the calories needed for muscle building. You probably can, but it's probably a very fine line of where you have to be an it may just be easier to do one and then the other. I also feel that if say you are 18% body fat and say 180lbs and you eat enough to build muscle and lift...you will put on weight (muscle) but you will still have your 18% body fat, so now you just look stocky vs lean/slim/muscular. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Dude, you're not going to get that "lean" look until you build muscle. It's not like you're going to touch some heavy weights and your all of a sudden going to be this bulky dude, doesn't happen. You'll burn the remaining fat you have faster if you put on some lean mass. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Art is right. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Artvandelay Dude, you're not going to get that "lean" look until you build muscle. It's not like you're going to touch some heavy weights and your all of a sudden going to be this bulky dude, doesn't happen. You'll burn the remaining fat you have faster if you put on some lean mass. Hah, I didn't mean that if I touch some weights I'm going to look like this bulky dude...was just saying why I think people do the weight loss first and then the lifting, so that they don't end up looking all stocky. Freaking 174.4lbs this morning, I'm dropping weight like a sick person, it's kind of weird. I have actually upped my calories the last week by a couple hundred to ~1400/day and still dropping weight. I'm doing SS though, as prescribed, so it's not as if I'm not lifting weights, though it still feels pretty light but I understand it's a gradual thing. We'll see what happens when I reach some heavier weights and if I can do them. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Keep it up. The point of the program is to build you up to actual heavy weight with good form. You'll get there. I'm telling you, if a fat dude starts packing on lean mass, he'll lose fat along the way. The whole bulk/cut thing is really more for advanced lifters. Once you get near your bodies natural limits, you have to make drastic changes to your diet and routine to get more results. The average skinny guy and average fat guy should both be looking to add muscle. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta I'm suprised that's 18.8% Like you've said, you look soft. Sure you're thinner. you want muscle. It's always been what you want. My advice? for what little it's worth? Do your S.S, stop ultra low calorie. Don't go apeshit, but at least to maintenance level. I'm not sure why you ever worried about getting down to 175 while still not lifting hard, building some muscle. Why are you fixated on the scale, focus on how you feel and look. I'm sorry, but I feel like that's such a girl attitude. I've said it before and I'll say it again. height/weight doesn't tell you shit about how someone looks with their clothes off. And Maybe OB1 can enlighten me too. Why if you're not obese, to cut down to some level before building muscle? Especially OB1 who cut down so much below his goal weight(right?) Wouldn't not yo-yoing have been less time, less stress on your body? Plus less extreme on your clothes fit? I'm between you guys in weight/height and lean-ness and I focused on weights first. I feel like being strong was the priority, losing a few lbs(in total) is the end goal. This absolutely is my current opinion as well. But easy for me to say because I did basically what it is your currently doing which was drop 20lbs to a fucking TINY 165lbs at 6ft tall in order to 'be ripped'. My wife was constantly giving me shit about looking like a cancer patient. I mean, I honestly am happy that I did it as it was the first time in my life I ever really had visible abs and it got me started with fitness again. But it just wasn't ultimately where I wanted to be forever and if I had it to do again I wouldn't have wasted that first year or more dicking around with trying to be/stay lean at the expense of getting stronger and eating more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
people make me laugh when they do the whole "lose fat" and "build muscle" into 2 different categories... you should always be trying to do both simultaneously... proper diet and hard training will remove fat from your ass... UNLESS you are taking in a large caloric surplus you are not going to end up some big bulky dude... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I guess I can sort of understand Val's perspective. As a smaller build guy my whole life I can't imagine try to lose weight without having muscles hiding underneath. You're coming from the other side. But I hear what you're saying (a little) on bulky. Even being small and adding just a 10-ish pounds from what I used to sit at and my clothes start barely fitting. That said, bulky and muscly is notably different than no muscly. Shoulders & chest rather than belly and mid-section, etc. I guess I look as it as more of a spectrum in the middle regarding "bulking" or "cutting". I'm not going to win body building competitions so there's no need to go nuts. I'm 31 and I can't imagine that super high calorie diets or super low are healthy. I'm surprised how far some of you guys will take it. It's interesting that both you guys say maybe you didn't need to as much down. Especially OB1 who's found it's hard to add "pure" muscle so you always get a little softness back when you're adding.(doesn't need to get out of hand though). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Gypsy, don't take my progress as normal either. When I graduated high school I was very strong and very very lean (which led to a lot of my injuries, another story). I was the same height, 5'9" I weighed 155 pounds and I was running roughly 8% body fat. I was benching 260 as my max 1rm, squats were 525x4 (but this was only to parallel, I didn't know of starting strength back then) and I could power clean a ton as well. Then I obviously didn't train as hard as I was when I was a full time athlete. I still hit the gym and weights 3-4 months a year but I added a good layer of fat over the muscle. So, I have a lot of muscle memory over the years. That's why I can shed the fat and you see me as looking fit. You don't have that muscle layer underneath. In Bovine terms. You were the veal and I was the bull. There is a huge difference in upbringing there. The veal calf that didn't get slaughtered will look dramatically different than the bull who had full range to roam. Get it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Thanks everyone for all the comments...it's a lot of info and as you guys pointed out, it really is different for every person and has a lot to do with their background as well, "muscle memory" and all that. I need to pick H Street NW's brain a bit more...he seems to be the closest scenario to me (where he looked quite "soft" when he started his diet). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OBGYN1 It's hard to find that sweet spot in your diet of bulking and not gaining fat. I haven't found it. Therefore it is 2 separate categories in my mind, and in reality. Even though you can do both. I dropped my weight rather quickly and felt better as a result. I'd do it again too. Although I'd prolly start lifting sooner than going to the bottom in weight before trying to grow in muscle. It's easier to monitor your diet when your fat is gone. Speaking from the POV of a newb trying to learn all of this in a sea of info that's good and bad. People need to remember that most people in these shoes are ignorant. Therefore they don't have experience, knowledge or trust that any system works. So they find something and work it until they're comfortable and then try more. It's just human nature. I haven't particularly found it. but simply lifting harder has resulted in me gaining tone and weight at the same time(simply gaining muscle really). But I know they only way I get more definition from this point is running and not gaining more weight. But ultimately I'm ok being a little soft as my bf% is still better than 12 months ago(ultimately even that was better than 7 years ago before I started running). My current goal would be about 5lbs more of muscle while getting my body ready for serious running. Then come Late april early may switching to running, dropping the 5lbs and just holding my strength while completing a few races. I wasn't trying to pick on you btw. Just wondering what your reasons were. It seems like Val wasn't sure what to expect because he hadn't been his goal weight, so he had a bit of learning in that area. You knew a bit more what you were doing and simply wanted the weight gone. Ultimately all of us are on a good program and in better shape than we were 12-18 months ago. Both of you have truly transformed your bodies too, so much props. We're all learning along the way, and figuring out better methods as we went along. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Quote: I need to pick H Street NW's brain a bit more...he seems to be the closest scenario to me (where he looked quite "soft" when he started his diet). Damn, some of you guys nerd the fuck out over shit. Listen, lift heavy, eat, run, repeat. That's it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Artvandelay Quote: I need to pick H Street NW's brain a bit more...he seems to be the closest scenario to me (where he looked quite "soft" when he started his diet). Damn, some of you guys nerd the fuck out over shit. Listen, lift heavy, eat, run, repeat. That's it I know, lol. When I walked into the weight room as a scrawny ass freshman weighing 120pounds wet, my coach didn't hand me an encyclopedia on biomechanics and nutrition. He pointed to the weights and told me to lift until I couldn't lift anymore, then he told me to run around the track until I couldn't run anymore. Good job, see you tomorrow. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Eat, lift heavy, sleep. Rinse, repeat. It's a very, very simple formula. But the body is very simple from a thermodynamics perspective. And also from a growing perspective. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I get the principles..it's just the details I get fuzzy about. I finally got the lifting part down...now the eating part, do I keep staying at ~1400 calories/day...do I increase? Honestly the workload of the lifting seems very light right now but Im going to follow the program and if it says go gradual, that is what I am going to do...but it doesn't feel like I'm doing all this work where I need more calories. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Dude, you have a lot of muscle to build. Is your deadline June 12, 2013 to look like Art? If the answer is no, you go to the gym and lift. That's it. Are you wanting to lose weight? Eat meals for a week and see if you lost weight. If you did, good job. If you didn't, eat less for a week and see if you lost weight. That's it. There is no special formula or program to follow. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FGZvFZdVbk |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy I get the principles..it's just the details I get fuzzy about. I finally got the lifting part down...now the eating part, do I keep staying at ~1400 calories/day...do I increase? Honestly the workload of the lifting seems very light right now but Im going to follow the program and if it says go gradual, that is what I am going to do...but it doesn't feel like I'm doing all this work where I need more calories. Yes, it's easy at first. the first 2 weeks are about form and the little muscles you don't even feel. It is easy, definitely. It's partially recovery from your old "program". You haven't been doing barbell bench, proper back squats, or deads have you? It's getting your body used to these motions and your neural pathways(people underestimate how much or nervous system effect our abilities). By week 3-4 you'll start to feel like you're working abit, but still waiting. even near your old PR you won't be working much week 4-5 you'll realize your old PR wasn't that hard afterall. Week 5-7 you'll be damn, I'm a stud! I might need new clothes, my shoulders, chest and quads rock and my waist looks nice(not small, but leanish) Week 8-whatever you'll be like, fuck these are hard week whatever you'll have a reset maybe a few. Even on your resets you'll be like hmm, not bad all over again. It works. Regarding calories. Don't be afraid to eat more. I can't tell you a magic amount. I know I added about 500-ish a day mostly in protein to my base diet(healthy-ish normal diet) and I barely gained a few pounds. I lost it the minute I stopped lifting and eating extra, but I look much different at 170 than I did on Nov 1 or June 1 at 170ish. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: dirtyS13drifta Yes, it's easy at first. the first 2 weeks are about form and the little muscles you don't even feel. It is easy, definitely. It's partially recovery from your old "program". You haven't been doing barbell bench, proper back squats, or deads have you? Did you mean to say "You hadn't been doing barbell bench...?" I was doing barbell bench 3x per week (decline, flat, incline) as part of the old program, 3 sets of 10 reps (or as many as I could get up, but that was the goal). proper squats and deads, no. Quote: By week 3-4 you'll start to feel like you're working abit, but still waiting. even near your old PR you won't be working much week 4-5 you'll realize your old PR wasn't that hard afterall. Week 5-7 you'll be damn, I'm a stud! I might need new clothes, my shoulders, chest and quads rock and my waist looks nice(not small, but leanish) Week 8-whatever you'll be like, fuck these are hard week whatever you'll have a reset maybe a few. I hope you are right on this part because I am a bit skeptical. Right now it seems easy, but then it seems to ramp up pretty quick and as I look forward now to the next 8 weeks, I'm having a hard time believing I will be doing squats/deads with 245lbs that soon, seems like a very fast progression and that my muscles would have to develop incredibly fast. Would be great if it does, I'm just having a hard time believing it now because on my old program, I seemed to go up in weight MUCH slower, but then again the program wasn't anything like this one. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ok, sorry. I just meant in general. I was doing DB bench myself. Press I wasn't doing, because I hate it. I'm giving you my feeling on it. When I started I hadn't done deads since i was in hs. I gave it a go at 60kg(132lbs) just to see. I did 15 reps. I could have done a little more. Regardless. I deadlifted 107.5kg(237) after my break and it was easier than the 60kg used to be. Before I took a break I hit 122.5(270). It was hard, but I don't think it was my 5rm max yet. Squats weren't far off. 60x10 vs 102.5x5 Bench from 72kg to 80kg x 5. But I started under 60kg for S.S. to get there. It worked. Those slow plodding steps add up quickly. I mean 10% on what was already a decent bench for me? I'll take it. I'm pretty sure with this reset I;ll go even further. The body can recover a lot in 48 hours, but you can't overtax it. Just test it's limits, then do it again. Don't go blasting it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy I get the principles..it's just the details I get fuzzy about. I finally got the lifting part down...now the eating part, do I keep staying at ~1400 calories/day...do I increase? Honestly the workload of the lifting seems very light right now but Im going to follow the program and if it says go gradual, that is what I am going to do...but it doesn't feel like I'm doing all this work where I need more calories. For a beginner, I'd recommend the approach that OB1 did. He was pretty fat. But he busted his tail. And I mean busted his tail. Apparently he was knocking out nearly a half pound a day (or more). Basically he got to a level where he was happy with his overall weight, albeit very skinny, and then used that as a frame to build off of. When you're losing weight like that, you quickly find your baseline. You're basically looking for your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR), which essentially the absolute minimum number of calories you'd burn in a day without an activity factor. Then, if you add in an activity factor, you'd find out how many calories you'd burn in a day. This is the number of calories you'd need to take in to: 1. Not gain weight 2. Not lose weight That's your baseline. It's entirely dependent on genetics as well as things like your activities throughout a given day, your height, weight, etc. Anyways, let's assume that your 1400 calories/day are the number of calories you need to maintain your current weight. Let's also assume that you're happy with the overall frame that you have and you'd like to add to it. This is where you're concentrating on things like: gaining strength and gaining muscle mass. Now, this is where you can play with a variety of things, and this is where everyone here are talking macro and micro levels in regards to their nutrients. IF you want to keep it simplistic, stick to what I've [and others] have been saying: take in more, quality calories and lift heavy. Essentially, you'll want to increase the number of calories. You're going to be feeding your engine. And if you give your body proper nutrients, you're essentially giving your body good gasoline, rather than skunky, nasty gasoline. As for the total number of calories to increase? This is where it is necessary to track your calories. I'm not talking about tracking differences of 10-15 calories. It becomes important to note: should I be taking in 100 extra calories a day? 200? 500? 1000? This varies from person to person, from activity factor to activity factor, etc. etc. I'd err on the side of incrementally increasing your calories. Make sure your calories are solid calories. When I was lifting like woah I was eating a combination of something like the following throughout the week: Milk + protein powder Tuna Chicken Cottage cheese Turkey Deli meats [lean] Yogurt Cheeses Soybeans [things like Edamame, for example] Peanut butter etc. etc. I'd weigh myself daily (sometimes twice daily). I'd track how many numbers were increasing (or decreasing) based on the number of calories I was taking in. I'd track if I was plateauing in my lifts [i.e. hitting a wall] as well as my weight. If I was plateauing and my weight was staying the same, I'd increase my caloric intake. Granted, you're (and nobody here is remotely close either) is on the level of someone like a Ronnie Coleman or a Jay Cutler, but there's a reason why these guys are taking in 7,000-10,000 calories a day when they're bulking. Granted, when they're cutting those numbers are a lot more along the line of 3,000-4,000. Which is still pretty high for us normal folk. Don't put too much thought into it. It really is very simple: 1. Find a baseline 2. Increase caloric intake to gain weight 3. Decrease caloric intake to lose weight 4. Strength train and have a surplus of calories to gain weight (and muscle) 5. Lift heavier and heavier. I hope I made this as simple to follow as possible. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Good stuff man, really appreciate the time you put into writing that. Couple of things... At 1400 calories, lifting M-W-F and doing light cardio (1 hr elliptical) T-Th, I'm still losing weight at around 1.5-2.0lbs per week. Using the general rule that 3500 calories = 1 lbs, that's 5250 - 7000 calories extra per week, or about 750 - 1000 more per day? Seems like a lot, and I'm sure it's not an exact science...like you said, just experiment by upping it 200 or so calories per day and see what happens. The other part of this equation is if I'm happy with my current frame, and that's the thing...I'm not. I have a lot of soft skin/fat and that is what I want to get rid of...more so (I think) than gaining muscle. I've brought it up before and no one has really commented on it (they may not know either) but I think it's partially a problem of loose skin and partially a problem of too much fat. I was 235lbs at one point with less muscle than now, 60lbs more than I am now...I have lots of stretch marks on my stomach and my hips (love handles). The pictures I put up in the other thread demonstrate it pretty well... I guess the general thought though is that if I put on muscle and "fill in" under the current fat, the fat will reduce in the process and I'll firm up. If it's partially a loose skin problem, I don't know how that plays into it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Your biggest problem is that you don't have much muscle mass. You may be light overall [175 pounds], but imagine if you were 175 pounds with actual muscle mass. Truth be told, you have some muscle. Mostly in your traps and deltoids. Your biggest issue is your chest. You really don't have much of one. The 5x5 should take care of that. Should also build your forearms nicely. Whereas putting on muscle mass will help you burn more calories daily (maintaining muscle does up your BMR...) and also fill yourself out in the areas you're looking for, I get the impression that you're not quite where you want to be in terms of a baseline. Your main issue, I'd imagine, in regards to your fat is the stomach area. It's not uncommon in people that lose that much weight. How tall are you? You look about 5'8" or 5'9"? Someone of your height being 175 pounds without much muscle mass should probably be sitting in the 155-160 range. I'm not a huge fan of BMI, but it's not a bad stat to use with people that don't have much muscle mass. For people that do (i.e. guys like Art and Drew [Silock]), it's a terrible stat as it would make them appear overweight. Hell, bodybuilders would be considered obese. So, you can go one of two ways: keep losing weight to get a better baseline and then monitor your caloric intake [overall appearance change] and add the muscle as you see fit. Or, take in a bit more calories, strength train, and fill yourself out. Personally, I think you'd be happier going with option #1. Although I can certainly understand why the more veteran lifters would advocate #2. It depends on what you want. I've always got the impression that you're the type that wants something, so you go get it. I think you'd be more gratified getting your weight at a respectable level, and then more fully understanding your body. Maybe I'm wrong. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm actually 6'1"...which is why when I started losing weight, I figured when I reached 175lbs, I would have gotten rid of the fat around my stomach. Obviously that isn't the case. My BMI is 23.1, which is above the middle point apparently. The middle BMI point for my height would put me at 161lbs. You're right, my main issue is my stomach. I'm ok with with my non-muscular arms and non-muscular chest...well, not "ok", but I don't hate them I fucking hate my stomach and would chop it off if I could. You're right about the two options you outlines and #1 is what I have been going for this whole time...I basically wanted to be "skinny", so I'm not embarrassed when I take my shirt off and sit on a chair or bend over to pick up something. I figured I would keep losing weight until the fat is gone (thought that would be 175lbs, again, obviously not) and then take it from there to start putting on some muscle. Now with the advice of this forum, I've kind of strayed toward option #2 but the challenge with that is that I'd like to still get rid of that fat around my stomach and I know it's possible while also putting on muscle but I'm not sure what the sweet spot is. Muscles need calories to build, but I want to make sure those calories are going to the muscles and not to maintaining/growing the fat. ...and oh yea, my biceps have some muscle too (not just traps and deltoids). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah, your biceps look to have a bit of muscle in that second picture. But most noticeable are your traps and deltoids. Didn't realize you were 6'1. If you can get yourself around 160, I think you'd be a lot happier with your appearance. Then build off of that. I think that if you went with #2, you'd be frustrated quite often. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Puck Yeah, your biceps look to have a bit of muscle in that second picture. But most noticeable are your traps and deltoids. Didn't realize you were 6'1. If you can get yourself around 160, I think you'd be a lot happier with your appearance. Then build off of that. I think that if you went with #2, you'd be frustrated quite often. I don't know that I agree. He'll hit 160 and still not find a ton underneath. 10lbs isn't going to reveal some sculpted body hiding. The things is the minute you start gaining again you'll lose you're abs anyhow. I think you'd be a lot better off building the basis underneath it and cutting away the fat after. Plus having more muscle will help you cut faster. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Whoa whoa whoa...abs? Yea right, in my wildest dreams. I think we are both talking about if I get to 160, I would get rid of those flab rolls you see in the bent over picture above. Honestly though I don't even know if 160 would do it, that's only another 15 lbs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The thing is even skinny you can not like taking your shit off. You don't have some excess of skin from being 235. Shit i looked mostly the same at 170ish and 5'8 in the gut(my moobs rock though). Starting strength + planks gave me better abs at 170 than running at 163 did. maybe my Adonis belt was slightly better at the lower weight, but I have a semblance of a 4 pack+ obliques again unflexed, something I hadn't had since I was sub 20years and sub 150lbs. My point is your core will look soft until you get below 10% body fat. That's fucking normal. Most people over 10% have a soft gut. Shit most at 10% still can't see much. So do you want to cut that much weight(20 ish pound by my sloppy beer math)? or would rather approach it from both directions(lean muscle gain and fat burn)? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ideally option #2 (lean muscle gain + lose fat), but can I gain muscle while still losing fat through a low calorie diet. Basically I'd like to keep doing Starting Strength and keep eating how I've been eating..I just dont know if I'll plateau real quick in SS with the calories I'm eating (not building enough muscle/as much as the program expects). Like Ive said, I'm not looking to look like Art starting out...I just want to look normal and not be embarrassed to take my shirt off. What's this dude's body fat approx? Not that he is really someone to strive to look like, but it's a good example of skinny and not much muscle, and I wouldn't be embarrassed at this point. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Whoa whoa whoa...abs? Yea right, in my wildest dreams. I think we are both talking about if I get to 160, I would get rid of those flab rolls you see in the bent over picture above. Honestly though I don't even know if 160 would do it, that's only another 15 lbs. Honestly most people will have those if they don't have a 6 pack. There's two ways to be, no belly fat, or enough to roll. I mean sure you' have more than some, but I still think more muscle will make it go way faster than removing all the fat. But yeah, if you lose 15 you might look like that d-bag. Or you could stay the same weight, not but new clothes, lift the same amount of time you'd be cutting and work at lifting rather than cutting and look better. Oh and be stronger. Muscles make a huge difference on looking good/decent at 10-20% bf. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You can't really accurately tell someone's bf from looks alone. Water retention plays a much bigger role at lower percentages. If you held a gun to my head and made me guess, I'd say close to 17-18. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
common that cant be your goal... just keep at it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric common that cant be your goal... just keep at it. Long term goal? No. But short term (as in the next 2-3 months), sure, I wouldn't mind. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's funny how goals and expectations can change. I thought for sure I'd be happy at 170 when I was 210. Then I got to 170, and even 165 isn't enough. my lowest has been 158 and that still wasn't cutting it. Currently at 167 and plan to get to 155 and I'm sure I'll want to be 150 once I get there (Im 5'7). Here's an example. The goal in triathlon is to be as lean as possible, while having the lower body and core strength to be fast on the bike and run. The current world Ironman champ is.5'11 and 150 pounds. and previous champ 5'11 and 171. I guess my point is that every body is different and one weight is not universal. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mr. Mom It's funny how goals and expectations can change. I thought for sure I'd be happy at 170 when I was 210. Then I got to 170, and even 165 isn't enough. my lowest has been 158 and that still wasn't cutting it. Currently at 167 and plan to get to 155 and I'm sure I'll want to be 150 once I get there (Im 5'7). Here's an example. The goal in triathlon is to be as lean as possible, while having the lower body and core strength to be fast on the bike and run. The current world Ironman champ is.5'11 and 150 pounds. and previous champ 5'11 and 171. I guess my point is that every body is different and one weight is not universal. yeah, big difference though. Yours is a fitness derived goal and OP's is purely cosmetic. You're not cutting for costmetics(I think), but to maximize your potential. He doesn't care if he's faster, slower or stronger, simply wants to look "ok" with his shirt off. He doesn't seem to realize that a bit of real muscle will go further for that than loosing all his body fat. But yet, he'll probably be a faster marathoner at 150lbs than his current 175lbs. But seeing as he hates running.... yeah. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Those guys look just as silly with their huge legs and bird chests as the dude-bros at the gym with their huge pegs and pigeon legs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Back 5 Those guys look just as silly with their huge legs and bird chests as the dude-bros at the gym with their huge pegs and pigeon legs. yeah, but at least it's a functional silliness. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mr. Mom Originally Posted By: Back 5 Those guys look just as silly with their huge legs and bird chests as the dude-bros at the gym with their huge pegs and pigeon legs. yeah, but at least it's a functional silliness. I'll agree. Personally that's my excuse for not running to much or lifting too much... I'm so worried about my balanced body! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mr. Mom Originally Posted By: Back 5 Those guys look just as silly with their huge legs and bird chests as the dude-bros at the gym with their huge pegs and pigeon legs. yeah, but at least it's a functional silliness. No doubt. I wish I had half their ability. I chose to create a more balance physique, one that will benefit me in a sport such as Rugby I'll be content, for now, with being able to run 5k and 10k races. I'd ultimately like to complete an Ironman, but I won't cut to their level. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
For sure. I hit my lowest weight ever the final week before my taper for Ironman Arizona. I was shovelling the food in, but the weight kept dropping. That was training 22 hours a week.....these guys are doing closer to 35. :wow: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Week 20 Update 5 months now since I started the weight lifting training, though it has been a bit all over the place and I'm just now settling into a long term routine. Did 12 months of a sort of wacky isolated muscle workouts, then took 4 weeks off over the holidays, and now 4 weeks of Starting Strength. I think the side shots show the most progress...do I see a little bit of shoulder muscles forming? Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 4 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/NoDiet_20weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/NoDiet_20weeks_front.html 20 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 4 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_front.html Biceps: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week20/0to20weeks_biceps.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
BTW, some people have asked if I am sucking in my gut in the pictures and I'm not...my stomach area right below my rib cage sort of sinks in, it's odd I guess. Since I was taking photos for the update, took some sucking in a pushing out photos too to settle that. Normal. Sucking in. Pushing out. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
My ribs do that too. Dude, awesome progress. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Week 24 Update Completed the 8th week of Starting Strength yesterday and 6 months since I started the whole diet/lifting with 1 month off in there. As many people here said, my goals would change and they have. When I started this, I basically just didn't want to be fat anymore...didn't really have any aspirations to put on a lot of muscles but as things progress, the muscles came anyway and I'm loving it. Now I never want to be some big meaty sort of guy, I don't like that look, but wouldn't mind getting close to something like Silock. I've got a couple of pains that I've been fighting through over the last week or so trying to finish out the 8 weeks so I'm planning on actually taking a week off from doing any exercise that includes any bending at the knees/hips. One pain in in my left butt cheek that is sort of dull until I bend my body over to my right and then it gets real sharp. It's not related to the lifting because I used to get it from time to time but usually just for a few hours, never for a week+. Second pain is in my right upper thigh area (almost where the leg meets the hip)...when I push up from the squat for example, I get this sharp pain for a split second as I'm about 3/4 of the way up...happens every time even if doing just a squat with no weights. I figure a week off will fix it then I can continue on, but I still want to keep doing the press, bench press, chin-ups and maybe deadlift too if I can. Will stay at 1500 calories for this week since it will be a light load and then up it to 1750 calories the following week as I think my weight at 168.1 lbs is good now. Time to put on some muscle mass and keep the weight around 170 lbs. And the photo updates... Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 8 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/NoDiet_24weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/NoDiet_24weeks_front.html 24 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 8 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/0to24weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week24/0to24weeks_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Those goofy mouseover pics aren't working. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
mouseover pics are working for me... side shots show a huge change... front shots show a change, but need some mass in your chest and shoulders bro... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mr. Mom (prude) Those goofy mouseover pics aren't working. Stupid Dreamhost server where I host my web stuff is acting up. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
This mouseover shit is a lot of work! I sort of want to do it for a year and then at the end take all the photos and make a GIF movie with all the frames. So...week 28 update. The last 4 weeks have been a bit different than before. Reached a new lowest weight of 166.1lbs a couple weeks ago and decided that is low enough on the scale so I upped the calories by 250/day and more liberal on the weekend (not really counting calories on the weekend). I've settled at a weight of 167-168 now with the calories I'm eating which is a good weight in my mind, but I still have a lot of fat that I need to convert to muscle. Weights got a lot harder to increase and most I had to try two or three times before I could complete the whole workout and up the weight again. Bench press is up 5lbs to 155lbs Shoulder press is up 7.5lbs to 107.5lbs Power Clean is up 7.5lbs to 92.5lbs Squat is up 10lbs to 205lbs Deadlift is up 15lbs to 230lbs Chin-Ups are up from 8/7/5 to 11/8/8 And here are the new pictures...I left one of them with the face shot so you can see the difference there too. It's weird, I never thought I had a chubby face back then, just always thought my body was. Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 12 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/NoDiet_28weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/NoDiet_28weeks_front.html 28 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 12 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/0to28weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week28/0to28weeks_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Now you're looking good val. For the 100th millionth time. Start eating(once your back to lifting). Fuck, I'm starting to see my casual approach to running and eating well isn't paying off. Time to up the cardio or all you fuckers will start calling me fat because I can barely see my abdominals. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Another month has gone by so it' time to update this thread. The last month has been pretty mixed...I reached some new personal bests but also got an injury to my right leg which put my squats, deads and cleans all on hold for 3 weeks. I continued to do press and bench plus chin-ups and I also introduced pull-ups, planks and sit ups to make up for the stuff I wasn't doing. Bench press is was up 5lbs to 160lbs (but I've reset this week) Shoulder press was up 2.5lbs to 110lbs (reset this week) Chin-Ups up to 12/10/7 Had my body fat measured via a dunk test, twice, one result was 12.54% and the other 13.17%. Also upped my calories from 1750 to 2250 this week and my weight is up a couple of pounds though some of it is water weight I assume as I was in the mid 164s last week and Im mid 166s this week. And photos... Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 16 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/NoDiet_32weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/NoDiet_32weeks_front.html 32 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 4 Weeks Off + 16 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/0to32weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week32/0to32weeks_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
nice work val... the up in calories should help you add some much needed muscle mass... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Good stuff. Keep at it. Even your face looks a lot leaner. Starting to add muscle now. The increase in calories is going to help a lot. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The before/after is pretty dramatic. I love seeing this stuff. It's exactly why people should take before/after pics. If you can get your chest to fill in, you'll be looking nicely proportioned. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Thanks for the comments and support guys. Can't believe it's been 8 months since I started, went by damn quick. At one year, I want to do a GIF of all the pictures. Yeah, my chest has always been the weakest part. It has definitely come a long way but still needs a lot of work. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Speaking of chest...interestingly, my chest looks better when I don't flex vs when I do. Left is no flexing, right is flexing... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Makes sense... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel Makes sense... Well this is all new territory for me, you know, the whole having muscles thing. Every other muscle group looks better when you flex...biceps, abs, legs etc...but the chest, not so much. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Needs to fill in before it'll look "better"... Time, training, rest, nutrition... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Chest is a bitch...trust me. When you're genetically predisposed to small mass there, it's going to be a long struggle to gain. Everything around it will swell first, or at least it did for me, as my arms, back, shoulders and then chest seems to be the order of growth. I'm the opposite, My arms are tiny. I've add auxilaries to get them a bit more. But my chest is pretty awesome for my size/strength. Any mass I gain is torso first though. This is a bit of genetics for sure. That said, even subtle changes in you bench can change how you develop for it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I have weird pecs. Kind of a strange shape and nipples at the bottom. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Week 41 Update Haven't had a chance to update this thread in over 8 weeks as the "update days" fell at a time that I was out of town but finally got a chance to today. At the last update, 9 weeks ago, I upped my calories from 1750 to 2250 per day and I've really seen that on the scale, not necessarily in a good way. Where I really think I've messed up is on the weekend though and really not being careful, which starting this past weekend I started to care again. I've put on 8.6lbs in the past 9 weeks and the body fat (according to the scale) has gone from 15.1% to 17.2%. I have gotten stronger at the gym, no injuries and I feel good doing the weights though I should be much further along but out of those 9 weeks, 2 of them I was on vacation and a reset. Some of my lifts are up a bit (Deadlift +10, Power Clean +10) while others are about the same (Bench +2.5, Shoulder Press +2.5, Squat +2.5). Chin-ups went from 12-10-7 to 14-10-7. This is a before and after of May 9th (left) vs July 9th (right). Not a huge difference but you can definitely see more definition in the before picture. It's definitely time for a change in my routine and that is what I will do once I max out this round, still not really sure what direction to go in really. I can't lie and say I'm not disappointed in the progress over the last couple of months. I've been eating, been getting good rest, did have some vacation but I've been hitting the gym and pushing myself as hard as I can and the gains really aren't coming. Not sure what the deal is but it's a bit frustrating, especially when you look at the gains Diezel has made in 6 months. Total Progess: Diet + 12 Weeks of Lifting + 6 Weeks Off + 23 Weeks Starting Strength Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/NoDiet_41weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/NoDiet_41weeks_front.html 41 Weeks (12 Weeks Lifting + 6 Weeks Off + 23 Weeks Starting Strength) Side: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/0to41weeks_side.html Front: http://nitnelav.com/Body/Mouseover/Week41/0to41weeks_front.html |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
you have a weird looking midsection/stomach/chest area. need more chest muscles. good job though on your progress. keep it up. /edited |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
No offense, but I'm going to go ahead and offend you anyway. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Lewis No offense, but I'm going to go ahead and offend you anyway. lol, i guess. nvm the no offense then. i'll edit it :P |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
My chest refuses to grow! I'm up to 215lbs on squat, 260lbs on deadlift, 115lbs on both shoulder press and cleans...fucking chest still at 160lbs...it's been like that for months. At the end of this month, I'm going to move on from Starting Strength and try a new program. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
What a novel idea... Ever heard of dumbbell presses...? Try it... Reps 8-12... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Are you eating food? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Are you doing any bench? Of course, as prescribed in the program, but can't seem to get past 162.5LBS. It's so fucking weird too, like I can do 4 reps pretty easily, and then on the 5th I just crash...it's not even like a progressive thing where it gradually gets harder with each set. And yea, I'm eating...so much so that I gained about 9-10 lbs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'd say it's more that he doesn't know how to recruit his pecs while benching and is using mostly his triceps. Val, google some pec activation exercises and try them out. Then, focus on that while you're benching. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Thanks for sharing your progress. I'm sort of going through the same thing right now. I started back in Jan. at 260lbs, 6ft 41yo. I've since lost 67 lbs., diet and exercise. I started going to a bootcamp style gym. Started very slow, it practically killed me. Finally broke through that initial pain wall about 4 weeks in, where most people give up after the first week due to muscle pain. From 2 to 3 days a week at first, to 6 days a week by late Feb. Pretty much HIIT. At first, my diet was lo cal, <1500 avg. Boot camp made me increase 1000 just to keep from passing out. I always wear a chest strap and constantly kept my HR around 85/90% of max(180). The strap shows I burn around 1000-1200cals an hour. So I conservatively I est. an honest 800. The biggest thing I've gotten out of all of this is diet. It still is the hardest part of this whole journey, but it has changed my lifestyle for the better. Fast forward to now. I now consider my self skinny fat. I've got no muscle, very slight trace of man boob still left, and an absolutely sagging ass. I can do 50 pushups, 100 situps, and run 6 miles under 50min. All this and I still can't do 1 proper pull up. I've lost 6"(34" woohoo!) around my waist but have no visible abs. You can still see fat around my gut, tri's(when I flex), and bit on my under my chin. I think my ass is narrower than my thighs. I'm now into week 3 of strong lifts 5x5 with hopes of getting stronger. I thought I would be extremely happy with just the weight loss, but now I find myself disappointed by the lack of muscle after all this hard work. I lift 3 days and still HIIT twice. I plan on doing a 1/2 marathon in Oct. so I'm not going to let up on the cardio until after that. I know it's a bit detrimental to recovery, but I'm still trying to accelerate weight loss. My goals(new) for now are to gain strength and 1/2 marathon in less than 1:40. I'll probably create my own post with pics and story sometime after I finish the first 12 weeks of SL. This whole journey has been a roller coaster of trial and error. Absolutely to many cooks in the kitchen when it comes to fitness training. Again, thanks for sharing your progress. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Way to stick with val. Definitely time for a change with the plateu in bench. Have you added push-ups or dips as an auxillary? I think both are "allowed" with S.S. I suspect a lot of it is just related to your lack of overall muscle/strength your whole live. It takes time sometimes. I've noticed your lats and shoulders have grown too, which may make your pecs look smaller. Still great progress since the beginning. I'd be intrigued to see what program you go for. I've just got my apartment and job, so now it's time to find a gym asap. I've gotten to bench once in 2 months. ugh... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Because you have no muscle there and I suspect you don't have a spotter to help you grow the numbers. Muscle takes a while too. I have small pecks but they're growing slow. Get a spotter and lift heavy and be patient. Also...dips. Weighted dips. don't need a spotter to 'grow the numbers' |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
There's no magic. With enough weight and continued exercises your chest will start to grow. To me, your chest matches your tiny arms. It takes a long time to get well proportioned muscles if you haven't been an athlete and haven't trained at it for a long while. Added to that, genetics play a big role and you can always beat them, but it takes a lot of work. Just keep lifting and working out and working on what you can't do and the muscles will come around. Again, there's no magic potion. You just haven't put in enough time and work yet. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
while Val thinks he's eating enough to grow, which he obviously has been if he's gained 9 pounds, his training is what is holding him back at this point... if you're not eating enough protein though, you're not going to increase muscle cell size though either... so it could be a diet thing as well... macros matter... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Protein has been a consistent 180-200 grams per day. Should be fine, no? I still write down what I eat everyday Mon-Fri...*checks Google Docs*...39 consecutive weeks now. I keep track of calories, protein and fiber. Another thing I noticed, which I find fucking weird, is how fast my strength drops. For example, 2 Friday's ago (08/17/12), I fucked up my back doing deadlifts (262.5lbs)...bad form and on the second rep, oops...felt like a pinched nerve, so I took all of last week off from lifting. Yesterday was my first day back at the gym and I did squats, chest press and cleans. Now last time I did these was 2 Wednesdays ago (08/15/12), so almost 2 weeks past, but I couldn't even come close to the numbers I did the previous workout. Squats: 195lbs previous 215lbs Press: 155lbs (could not even complete the whole exercise, stalled out on set #3 rep #5). Previous 160lbs Cleans: 105lbs previous 115lbs Fucking bullshit, how the hell, in less than 2 weeks, could it drop that much? Now I basically have to build back up over the next few gym sessions. Maybe everyone is sort of like this and I just don't know it? Seems odd. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Protein is fine so it's your training... Are you using creatine? You should be... Are you getting "enough" sleep...? Can't grow without proper rest... Still think your program sucks... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
+1 on programming |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock I'd say it's more that he doesn't know how to recruit his pecs while benching and is using mostly his triceps. Val, google some pec activation exercises and try them out. Then, focus on that while you're benching. Related to this...when you guys do bench press, where do you place your hands on the bar? Maybe I have mine too close and am using my triceps too much and not my chest enough? Though if that was the case, you'd think my triceps would be huge, and of course, that's not the case. I grab the bar where I've marked it in red on the picture below... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I put my ring finger on the rings. Where you put your hands depends upon how wide your shoulders are. So, it may be different for you. But if you're in between the smooth part in the middle and the weights on the end, I'd say your grip is too close. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Should have colored in the area where I grab the bar before posting the pic, see the new edited pic above. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Unless you're a midget, that's WAY too close. Like I said, I put my ring fingers on the rings (outside where you have marked red), and that's a REALLY close grip (to save my dislocate-prone shoulder). Yours is SUPER close. You need to go way wider. Most guys will put their index finger on the rings, or just outside them. Try that and see how it goes. You might need to work your way back up in weight, though. Such a drastic change could be pretty hard. Or, it may be easier considering you'll be recruiting more muscle fibers. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Good to know, thanks for the tips. Maybe that's been the problem holding me back, seeing how all my other weights have increased, except for chest. And no, not a midget...6'0". :P |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Val, ditch bench press for now, do a bunch of varied push ups, plyo pushups, pushup's with a 3 second descent count and explode up, diamond push ups and super wide push ups. when you can bust 100 out no problem, worry about getting on a bench, by then your body will know how to include the chest. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
100?! God damn, that would take a while. I can bust out 40 or so now. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I disagree. Get on the bench, widen your grip and try increasing the lifts. Follow up with dumbell incline and a set or two of elevated pushups on stand (dumbells work great for stands). Not a chance I could bust out 100 pushups, but I can bench over 300 and have done 330 before. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock Unless you're a midget, that's WAY too close. Like I said, I put my ring fingers on the rings (outside where you have marked red), and that's a REALLY close grip (to save my dislocate-prone shoulder). Yours is SUPER close. You need to go way wider. Most guys will put their index finger on the rings, or just outside them. Try that and see how it goes. You might need to work your way back up in weight, though. Such a drastic change could be pretty hard. Or, it may be easier considering you'll be recruiting more muscle fibers. same here, ring finger, on the rings of the bar. I think that puts my forearm near vertical at the bottom of the motion. somethings up, your chest doesnt seem to be growing... 150lb bench after so many months? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impetuous I disagree. Get on the bench, widen your grip and try increasing the lifts. Follow up with dumbell incline and a set or two of elevated pushups on stand (dumbells work great for stands). Not a chance I could bust out 100 pushups, but I can bench over 300 and have done 330 before. I'd just swap flat for incline for awhile. I'm not a huge fan of dumbell press. Too easy, and too easy for someone to get injured. IMO |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
If its too easy you need bigger DBS hulk... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impetuous I disagree. Get on the bench, widen your grip and try increasing the lifts. Follow up with dumbell incline and a set or two of elevated pushups on stand (dumbells work great for stands). Not a chance I could bust out 100 pushups, but I can bench over 300 and have done 330 before. yeah but whats your chest look like compared to your massive ass arms? anyone with a decent core can build up to a big ass bench, still doesn't mean you're using your chest to throw up 300lbs. I can do 120 push ups with a 200m run in between breaks in about 12 minutes. But I can't bench over 200lbs for reps because I can't incorporate my chest into it. close grip no problem, wide grip I just have to concentrate on using the chest only and normally only feel it on negatives. I would figure someone with less athletic ability than me has it worse to where they're posting pictures of a barbell trying to ask where they should grab the bar to properly build a chest. if you want to be strong do bench, if you want to build the chest, your sternum, and your core do regular ass push ups. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Push ups are more about endurance than anything else. I don't understand your theory. You're suggesting that Val should be able to do a ton of push ups to help his bench, yet you can do a ton of push ups and still can't bench a lot. How many push ups would it take to get a good bench? Over 120? You said: "when you can bust 100 out no problem, worry about getting on a bench, by then your body will know how to include the chest." Obviously, that's not true. Now, I'm not saying that he should ignore push ups or that they don't have carryover to the bench -- they absolutely do. But they're just a tool in the arsenal and not the end-all, be-all of benching with your chest. Anyway, I think a change in grip will help him out. I think I've shown him this video before, but it's always worth another look. http://www.dieselcrew.com/how-to-bench-press-correctly |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Take steroids, do bench, get chesticles... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock I put my ring finger on the rings. That's what I was told to do way BITD and always did as a result. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock I put my ring pinkly on the rings. Fixed for me, but that's only a 1/2" dif between pinkies and ringe fingers. Val, you are a bit close if your 2" narrower than that. What angle are your elbows. I've heard your body should look like an arrow. I.e. elbows at about 45 deg from body as you bring the weight down and lower. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel Take steroids, do bench, get chesticles... Said none truer! lol And Andrew, I was suggesting to get the basics of using your chest down doing regular ass push ups rather than trying to pile 10 more lbs every week and trying to tell your body (now lift this with your chest only) you do something enough your body adapts to it. not everyone is going to activate their chest primarily on a bench. Val is exercising for cosmetic purposes not to be strong. You want to fill that chest out do push ups, of course you want to do regular lifting incorporated with that but that endurance you mentioned is what will net you a few more reps so you're not pissing away sets due to lack of. Doing a shitload of push ups has helped my bench capacity. Val is small and really has nothing to work with unlike everyone else giving him advice I think push ups like I mentioned would do wonders for him. Tom Hardy got as big as he is with just push ups and and kickboxing training. edit : watched the video you posted... that's pretty much how people should be benching. that small correction has also helped immensely with my handstand push ups. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: 137 not everyone is going to activate their chest primarily on a bench. I agree. That's why I said he should google some chest activation exercises, as well. Quote: Val is exercising for cosmetic purposes not to be strong. You want to fill that chest out do push ups, of course you want to do regular lifting incorporated with that but that endurance you mentioned is what will net you a few more reps so you're not pissing away sets due to lack of. I guess I'm more of the opinion that strong = cosmetic. Heavy lifting just looks the best, especially when combined with low body fat. Quote: Tom Hardy got as big as he is with just push ups and and kickboxing training. He didn't build that body without 'roids and a ton of weight training. There's just no way. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock He didn't build that body without 'roids and a ton of weight training. There's just no way. LOLOLOLOL!!!! HATERAID!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Fitness advice from 137? Lolz |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Artvandelay Fitness advice from 137? Lolz Any kind of advice from ART... LOL!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: 137 Originally Posted By: Silock He didn't build that body without 'roids and a ton of weight training. There's just no way. LOLOLOLOL!!!! HATERAID!!! Trutheraid! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Why nothing on dips or decline, Drew? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
just stay away from the gimicky machines for dips bodyweight dips are ideal. I find it hard to get in the same position you would through natual dips on the various machines. Except the one knee rest that goes up and down. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
i had to google that tony guy. youre delusional if you think hes natural. sorry trap thickness like that = not natural |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric i had to google that tony guy. youre delusional if you think hes natural. sorry trap thickness like that = not natural here is his workout for bronson http://youtu.be/VJ0lHEd9Eyg and he was doing that on top of everything included for warrior. http://youtu.be/uKfqrzovecQ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's the same as Chris Evans, he put on about 30lbs for captain america on top of already being in awesome shape, and you can tell he wasn't as big when he did avengers. Hardy is probably right back at 165-170 now! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 What am I missing? This doesn't look steroid-ish. I always assume these guys are on steroids... why? because why not... They have the means, and they are typically asked to be in amazing shape in relatively short amounts of time under heavy time constraints. Thinking of 300, they had a few months to get ripped out of their minds. Sorry, but too many people in that crossfit gym not looking like sparta for me not to be a little skeptical. Not that I care... I take a firm stance that anyone who can take steroids and come out looking like hardy, evans, jackman, ect; should damn well be juicing up if they are so inclined. Many may fault me for wasting my time with it, and Im not disagreeing. But if you can make it work lol, hells yeah. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Look at his pics of him as Bane. Dude was seriously on the sauce. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I dunno. If it's your actual job to get ripped for a role and you're in a gym with a world class trainer for 3+ hours a day, I'm thinking major gains can be made over the course of 6 weeks |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hollywood guys always talk about the "worked out hard for 3 months for this role" and yet they are totally transformed from normal. That doesn't just happen naturally. If they pay for lipo, plastic surgery, implants etc., they'll take drugs too. I mean, how many guys here eat well, lift hard, do cardio, do crossfit and have done this for a long time - yet still don't look anything like movie "buff". |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: g@mby I dunno. If it's your actual job to get ripped for a role and you're in a gym with a world class trainer for 3+ hours a day, I'm thinking major gains can be made over the course of 6 weeks Muscles take time to grow. It happens outside the gym; not in it. However, steroids greatly increase the growth rate. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impetuous I mean, how many guys here eat well, lift hard, do cardio, do crossfit and have done this for a long time - yet still don't look anything like movie "buff". I'm sure if I knew about im when I was doing my 2 month cut instead of eating 2000 cals a day throughout it and controlling my insulin this would've been a greater yield. https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/412392_10150565313225740_967472315_o.jpg people think that you take steroids and it tells your brain to make your body huge, it just allows quicker recovery, you still have to do the work. weather he's on the sauce or not is debatable. I think it's believable for anyone to shift 30 pounds in 2 months time. I did it so someone who gets to live in a gym daily for 2 months I don't see how it's not possible. Kid at my gym weak as shit works at the gym now, kids lifts have soared past mine, too bad he's asian so he'll never see the muscle tone and he eats like shit and he's also packed on 20lbs eating wahoo's every damn day. But I'm sure on that dudes diet of chicken, brocolli, and protein shakes anything is possible. Look at Corey's transformation, he did in 6 months what would take someone 2 years. Body starts in the kitchen followed by the gym. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I think most would be hindering themselves spending 3 hours a day in the gym daily. Presuming he isn't fucking around. But with steroids maybe he could accelerate recovery to capture that |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: 137 Look at Corey's transformation, he did in 6 months what would take someone 2 years. Body starts in the kitchen followed by the gym. He had been there and had the muscle before. He wasn't starting from average non-workout guy. He was a former weightlifter who ate too much and re-dedicated himself. At any rate, people like to say steroids don't make you big without work - no shit, but almost everyone who is huge is on them. There is some myth out out there that people can just get huge and buff by working out harder/more. The biggest guys on this site are far from even a typical Hollywood or WWE "big" look. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: 137 Look at Corey's transformation, he did in 6 months what would take someone 2 years. Body starts in the kitchen followed by the gym. Tom Hardy is WAY bigger than Diezel. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: g@mby I dunno. If it's your actual job to get ripped for a role and you're in a gym with a world class trainer for 3+ hours a day, I'm thinking major gains can be made over the course of 6 weeks Clueless...? Hi I'm Cory... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hardy is 5'10"... Don't know his weight but from the pics I've seen he doesn't look to be more than 210 or so... Cameras can make people look larger or smaller too... All those guys are on the sauce though if they go from 170-200+ in a few months... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Quote: The biggest guys on this site are far from even a typical Hollywood or WWE "big" look. If you put me next to some of these guys, or like ripped 80's stallone, I'd look like I was andre the fucking giant. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You'd look taller, but he's one of the shortest "action" stars and he's still a juicing machine. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel Hardy is 5'10"... Don't know his weight but from the pics I've seen he doesn't look to be more than 210 or so... Cameras can make people look larger or smaller too... All those guys are on the sauce though if they go from 170-200+ in a few months... Sorry Val we have de-railed... lol Hardy sits at 165 and bulked up to 185 for fighter he put the 30lbs on for dark knight rises and was sitting at 210, and while he still looked muscular, it was more lighting and special effects because he was pretty soft too and all of his tattoo's were digitally removed. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impetuous You'd look taller, but he's one of the shortest "action" stars and he's still a juicing machine. I used to have a picture of me and the rock, I was taller and honestly, probably bigger. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 And he'd tear Art apart with 1 arm and 1 leg. Let's be honest, I could pick you up by your face and throw you across a room. I have no doubt that I could lift you up single arm by your face. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQvB6OjHOU kinda like that, except, without the camera angle tricks to make stallone look like he's only 6 inches shorter than drago. lolz |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
my girl is waaaaaaay hotter than your mexi-cunt. You don't think I'm pretty?! oh no! I don't give a fuck, little guy. lol oh you ugly! You're a fucking midget who lives on a message forum. Self-proclaimed or not I could crush you into a fine fucking powder without putting my beer down. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's funny you say that, you've said it before. If anything, I have a gigantic dome piece, not like it's a good thing or anything. It's just you're reaching for something. You talk a lot of shit on the internet, you basically live on this forum just projecting your shitty traveling salesman texas life onto everyone, screaming and grasping at anything you can to try an appear superior. It's so so see through bro. You have a gigantic head and disproportional body because you're a midget, just like your kids are midgets. It's hilarious that you talk so much shit to me over the internet. You wouldn't say a god damn thing to my face, and even if you worked up the nerve to, you'd need a god damn ladder to do it. My whole point in this thread, like justins, was that it's fucking easy to look at a picture of a person next to normal objects, their proportions, and judge height +/- a few inches. Which is why you're so upset, I know, I know "1000 dollars" and you'll do it. You won't because you sit on a phonebook to see over the steering wheel. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
you talk shit to someone three times your size over the internet. Congrats. You must feel pretty tough. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hey fuckers don't get my thread here closed! Fight in your own thread. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Alright enough of this shit. I'm sorry OB1, can we be friends again? at least until the giants cowboys game? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 All I ever wanted to be was friends. One edited quote somehow made us enemies. And somehow all of your guy's posts combined has made you faggots lol. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
*non-sexual man hug* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hit the gym today and it was squats/bench/cleans day... Tried the new wider grip bench and wow it feels like a completely different exercise. Fucking pisses me off, for 8 months I've been doing them wrong. I dropped the weight to 145lbs since it was the first time doing them like this but it felt good, felt a lot better thoughtout the whole exercise vs crashing on the last rep before. I'm guessing the crashing was due to triceps muscles tiring out faster than other, bigger muscles? With the narrower grip on bench press, my 5 rep set would feel like... Easy Easy Easy Medium Can't do it With the wider grip, it was more even... Easy Easy Easy-medium Medium Hard |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Glad to hear it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yep, way more power out of the wider grip. Glad it worked. I'll bet you start to see some progress/growth before long. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
you should feel it in your chest the whole way through. not something I generally share, but I sometimes find myself "practicing" the bench press in the shower, standing up, just trying to "isolate" the pec. I expect to feel that same contraction on the bench. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I will add, you can't perpetually hit goals. Most of us gain quickly (everyone can), then struggle for a period. Mine was pure ignorance and genetics. Strong like bull, lummox. I do wonder why I bother and what the ceiling is. How many natural, lean lifters bench 300+? And if/when they do, how much more can they realistically add? Can they maybe get to 400? I've been at it for 15 years. I worked hard all 15, but didn't work smart. Not sure what else could have changed, but just keep at it. It's never as easy as people think. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm still in it for the looks, don't really have a goal of going higher and higher weight wise. If I looked good while benching 155lbs, that's all the weight I'd need. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I didn't do jack shit athletically as a teen so you're right. On another note, my right shoulder is killing me today! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I don't lift for looks, it's a by-product. I lift for strength. No two people are identical but in order to grow big pecs you need to lift big weight (relative). You've seen great strength gains with SS but you may want to think about switching to an intermediate 5x5 and simply swapping the flat for incline bench. Dips, DB press, all that stuff are great but for truly big pecs you need big strength. Work incline for a couple months, swap back to flat. boom. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
he's genetically disadvantaged... not being a dick, but it's pretty obvious... gonna HAVE TO WORK to get pecs to grow... some lucky fucks just have those armor plate looking chests... you sir are not one of them... i'm in the same boat though, so you can defintitely make improvements, but yeah you gotta lift some heavy ass weights in a mid rep range 6-10... i personally go 8-12 myself, but 6 reps will make muscle grow if you are progressively overloading it... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Any rep range between 3 and 15 will make a muscle grow. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Why not 1-2 then...? As long as you are progressively overloading it, it should be under enough stress to grow... I just recommend at least 6 from personal experience... He'll I went on the low end cause I RARELY do less than 8 reps... Last set I may only push out 6-7 on occassion... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
1-2 reps haven't been shown to have statistically significant growth in studies. Reps over 15 haven't shown to be of greater benefit to growth than reps of 15 or less. I don't think there's enough stimulation in that range for some reason. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Well I'll stick in that middle range until I see studies that prove otherwise... I will throw in a set or 2 of high rep 15+ sets every now and again just to get that pump going... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
There's nothing wrong with the middle range at all. Anywhere from 3-15 is fine. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
all kinds of gains are possible Val. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiX9UcuQw4o&feature=share&list=UU4FhvdvgZU5CVbXi2uWgiZg |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Those guys are the definition of meat head. I made it about 20secs. I'd rather listen to them than read you and art going back and forth about your height and who's bigger. They're meatheads but their results speak for themselves. I actually just went through their videos from 6 months ago and till now where you can see them drop from 25% body fat to 5.6% while making. AAAALLL KINDS OF GAINS. But it's just advice OB1, you can do whatever the FUCK you wanna do |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm guessing that's a TMW vid... Those guys are entertaining but typically they flip flop their advice every couple of months... They are the definition of "bros"... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Took some updated photos this morning since I'm moving on from Starting Strength, wanted to have a new baseline... Weight was 173.0 this morning, very similar to last time I look pics which was 07/09/12 at 172.5 lbs. however noticeably higher than on 05/09 when I was 166.6lbs, and you can tell in the picture. My wife actually says I look better now, that I was too "scrawny" in the left picture so there's that. May 09, 2012 (166.6lbs) vs September 17, 2012 (173.0lbs) My arms look decently sort-of-big in the picture, I don't feel like that when I look in the mirror though...maybe it's the angle of the camera. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
you have a very odd physique lol but keep at it, and it can only improve I presume. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Why odd? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
At this point I think it only comes down to the lack of chest mass. More of an overall "V" taper in your upper body will help, too. I'm sure you're acutely aware of both of these things and I'm not out to diss you. Your chest HAS to come around at some point if you're working on it enough. I have no idea what it's gonna take, though. Your arms are looking great (no homo). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Why odd? its as if you are missing pecs, your boobs are sad or something. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Aretard Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Why odd? its as if you are missing pecs, your boobs are sad or something. Do pushups until you want to die val, then supplement that with ring dips lol. I'm just kidding btw. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Aretard Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Why odd? its as if you are missing pecs, your boobs are sad or something. I see what you're saying. OP how often do you do decline work? It looks like you need to isolate the pecs a bit more and add more exercises/weight to up the volume if that makes any sense. Forgive me I didn't read through the entire thread so not too familiar with you're overall routine/diet. The before and afters look pretty good, just keep in mind as an ectomorph your gains will be harder, low rep/high intensity is key for you. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
He doesn't need "low rep"... And you can isolate the pecs plenty if you use proper form on the flat bench... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yo DieZel I sent you a PM a couple days ago, did you get it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel He doesn't need "low rep"... And you can isolate the pecs plenty if you use proper form on the flat bench... I would tend to disagree, and I'm merely talking about his pecs. I read enough to know he just wants to look good, not get huge. He has nearly no volume in the lower pecs, no matter how good your form is on a flat bench I don't feel it stimulates the lower portion of the pecs nearly as well as decline. Not to mention you are putting more on your pecs and less on stabilizing muscle groups to assist with the lift. If he incorporates this into his routine and uses a good blend of weight/reps he should see some growth. If nothing else he is hitting the muscle group differently and creating new challenges for the his muscle fibers which is a fundamental part of any routine. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I agree with doing decline, but for different reasons. IMO, Val should switch to something like the 5-3-1, and do decline bench for his accessory work on Military Press and Bench days. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Drew, that's actually what I'm working on switching over to. Corey sent me an email with a bunch of stuff on 5-3-1 including a book on the whole program. It seems pretty straight forward in concept but I have to sit down and figure out all the starting weights and the increments to increase at plus what accessory work I should be doing, I'm going to need some help here and someone to tell me "Do this on this day and this on this day"...I hate the figuring out part, that's why Starting Strength was good for me...I don't want freedom to make choices. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
squats, bench, shoulder press, dead lift... over and over with the heaviest weight you can pick up off the ground. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Well I got that part...but what about the accessory exercises? The book on 5-3-1 has a crapload of different stuff...which ones should I do, on what days, and how many reps. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
What days are you planning on training? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Well I got that part...but what about the accessory exercises? The book on 5-3-1 has a crapload of different stuff...which ones should I do, on what days, and how many reps. Read the book. It tells you what to do on what day, and gives the rep ranges. You can either pick from a list of accessory exercises, or choose one of the premade plans like Boring But Big. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel What days are you planning on training? If you'd read your damn PM, you'd know! I'm planning to do the Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday routine. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Silock Originally Posted By: HX_Guy Well I got that part...but what about the accessory exercises? The book on 5-3-1 has a crapload of different stuff...which ones should I do, on what days, and how many reps. Read the book. It tells you what to do on what day, and gives the rep ranges. You can either pick from a list of accessory exercises, or choose one of the premade plans like Boring But Big. Hmm, I don't remember it having premade plans...I wonder if it's the same book? The one Corey sent me is called Jim Wendler 5/3/1 "The Simplest and Most Effective Training System for Raw Strength". |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yes it's in there peckerneck... ;-) There are like 5 different accessory protocols you can follow... Boring but big is one of them... I used the periodization one but kinda am doing MY THAAAANG... With OHP i do my sets then do 3 sets OH Dumbell press, 5 sets flat DB bench, 5 sets Tbar rows, 3 sets of DB laterals and BO DB laterals, then do 5-6 sets for tris... Deadlift do my sets, then 5 more at 60% training max for 10 reps, seated leg curls 5 sets, calf raise 5 sets, shrugs 5 sets, 5-6 sets of biceps shit Bench press do my sets then 5 sets DB incline press, 5 sets Kroc rows, 5-6 sets triceps work, 3 sets DB pullovers, 3 sets face pulls (hitting rear delts 2x a week for the round look in the rear... Squat I've replaced with leg press do my 531 sets then 5 sets of 10 , 5 sets leg extension, 5 sets seated calf, 5-6 sets of biceps shit... I'll throw in some core work on lower body days... 5-8 sets... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel Squat I've replaced with leg press Boooooooooo! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hey man as long as I'm making gains I'm ok with it... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
For you, do Boring but Big as it's very straight-forward and a good intro to 5/3/1. Check out this site man it makes the 'what do I do' a moot point. Just plug in your current numbers, choose the 'boring but big' template and hit 'calculate program'. http://www.blackironbeast.com/5/3/1/calculator |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: mrnismo For you, do Boring but Big as it's very straight-forward and a good intro to 5/3/1. Check out this site man it makes the 'what do I do' a moot point. Just plug in your current numbers, choose the 'boring but big' template and hit 'calculate program'. http://www.blackironbeast.com/5/3/1/calculator Freaking perfect! Exactly what I was hoping would be out there as I have something like that for 5x5 but hadn't seen it for 5/3/1. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
according to that chart your sets go... 5reps @ 45lbs 5reps @ 60lbs 3reps @ 70lbs that's your warmups... i typically don't do 3 warmup sets, typically 2 myself... Then your "work sets" are... 5reps @ 75lbs 5reps @ 85lbs 5+reps @ 100lbs - go to failure or 1 rep prior... then with the boring but big accessory work you'll do 5 more sets @45lbs but do them for sets of 10... then do 5 sets of chinups (with or without additional weight if you can)... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
and Val if you're THIS lazy just making up a program, i can only imagine how lazily you are in the gym... you may think you're really pushing yourself, but i'd be willing to bet you have the intensity of a slug... put a little effort into shit, instead of needing to be spoon fed bro... everyone is here to help, but damn man, you're like a woman that doesn't know shit about her car trying to explain to the service tech the issue she's having... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Holy jesus that's a crapload of the same exercise on the same day! So it's 78 reps of each "main" exercise? About double of Starting Strength program which was 35 reps per exercise. At the same time though, SS had two "main" exercises per day while this just has one, so total reps you're doing are the same. I'm surprised it doesn't have other chest exercises as well, I thought I saw in there that they also had incline bench and dumbbell bench, or is that for other weeks? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: DieZel and Val if you're THIS lazy just making up a program, i can only imagine how lazily you are in the gym... you may think you're really pushing yourself, but i'd be willing to bet you have the intensity of a slug... put a little effort into shit, instead of needing to be spoon fed bro... everyone is here to help, but damn man, you're like a woman that doesn't know shit about her car trying to explain to the service tech the issue she's having... It's not that I'm lazy making up the program...I'm just confused on how to make up the program, like what exercises I should be doing...incline bench, flat bench, decline bench, dumbbell bench, flys etc etc. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
but it's all in the book i sent you man... but just stick with the basic, boring but big for now... add in a tricep exercise on OHP and Bench day, and a bicep exercise on deadlift and squat day... just pick something and do 5 sets of 10, and track it so you can make progressive gains on them... if you move up and only get 10,10,9,8,8 then next time try and get 10,10,10,9,9 etc... once you get all 10's bump weight again... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: OB1 Seems like a shit load of time at the gym. How long are you there? Probably about an hour looking at the workload. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
nah you can do the boring but big in 30 minutes... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It took me 45 minutes to do Boring But Big exactly as written, but I pussed out and took plenty of rest time. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Omg 78 reps...? How long does 1 rep take 3 seconds...? That's a whole 240 seconds worth of lifting man... Trust me the main exercise sets takes like 20-30 TOPS... The accesory work can take another 20-30 or if you do more volume like me, maybe 45-60... I spend about 90 minutes at the gym from the time I walk in til I walk out but I'm Doing anywhere from 30-40 sets each time I walk in there... Most people don't need or want that much volume.... If in doing cardio I'm there an additional 25-30... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Squat days always take the most time for me as I need (or at least want) the most rest between sets. I'd estimate the squat day for boring but big like this: 3 warmup sets basically no rest between sets = About 5 minutes total. Your rest period is however long it takes to add weight between sets. For the 3 work sets, give yourself 3-4 mins for the set plus reset so 12 minutes total. 5 set of 10 = 10 maybe 15 mins total time. Add it all up that's about 30 mins to do your squats. Now you have 5 sets of leg curls (I prefer Romanian deadlifts but whatever) again say 3 minutes each set including rest is another 15 mins. So you're looking at 45 minutes actual workout time. 10-15 mins warmup and 10-15 cool down is still just barely over and hour and this is giving yourself plenty of rest. Deadlift day goes about the same time wise. OH press and Bench, at least for me, require less rest time so usually well under an hour total time those days. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm in and out of the gym in less than 45 minutes doing Boring But Big, and that's including warmups and cooldowns. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
makes everything sound easy ^ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nothing is every easy, but I find that it's mostly due to fatigue, aches, working out after a long day of work etc. But a weight workout should be a quick affair. I warm up for about 8-10 minutes, then set the timer at 3 minutes and go to town. Since most of my workouts have about 10 working sets, it's a 30 minute affair (and about 45 minutes total with warm up/stretching). The tougher thing is cardio (specifically higher intensity shit). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
hell a 5x5 involves 15 sets... if your 30sec under the weight, 90sec rest, 2min per set, thats 30minutes for the core workout. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
5x5 has more working sets per workout, though. You don't need a lot of rest time for the accessory work in the 531. I usually take 1 minute between sets for the accessory lifts, and I alternate muscle groups so that the muscles are getting 2 minutes of rest time between sets. Core lifts take about 10 minutes. Accessory lifts about 10. |