|
|
|||||||
feel the bern! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Maybe next week bro. How exactly does this work, just hop on the trainer for 20 minutes and hammer and get watts? What's your goal bro? I'm hoping for 220? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
hopefully >300w somewhere. feel the bern bro! the 'shorter' version which takes ~45m on the program. 20 minutes of actual hammering but theres a few intervals before that to keep it honest/hard efforts in there |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I would participate if I had a trainer...can I do it on rollers? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
vpower compatibility I think requires a trainer w/a known resistance curve. Or you easily could if you had a hub/wheel/crank/pedal based power meter otherwise based on recommendations here I went with a $150 CL kurt kinetic and then added the ANT+ USB dongle for my labtop and then a speed/cadence sensor [ant+] for the bike, all in not much over $230 or something |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I will never own a trainer. AND FOR THAT REASON, I AM OUT!!! 3 Freds is 2 too many. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I think some people do a ftp test on-bike if the winds are calm when using a on-bike powermeter. Figuring out how to do the warmup 'right' is the only challenging part. of course if you have an actual race and record power you have a pretty darn good idea what your ftp is anyways if you just look at net output If I had an on-bike power meter I'd be even more annoying to everyone |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
40m till go time! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Looks like there's 1x20 or 2x8 options I might do the latter given my lack of knowledge of proper effort level. Are we reporting 20minute output or FTP (20 min X.95)? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You guys have gone full retard. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
exactly, like last time I got 290w, so it calls that 276 which I believe is the 1-hr FTP assumption from the shorter test it goes like warmup, a 1x5 at your planned FTP, more warmup stuff, occasional 120% of planned FTP [2x1] more slower stuff, back and forth, and then 20m hammer time at your planned FTP I plan on leaving a got damned disaster on these shoddy pine floorings here |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
TiL: monitoring objective performance based cycling data is 'retarded' yet running/training for ultras is not |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Mrs. Ironmom You guys have gone full retard. I feel like this is the road-bike equivalent of running a 5km on a treadmill Stupid, but nice for getting a baseline |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I just think he's a [closet?] dataphobe snob. Eg look how fast I am, I dont need to monitor any data [so you shouldnt either]. Hasn't gone out and said it yet but I figure I might as well throw it out there and stop the waiting! For me personally, it helps me set/guess/estimate the planned speed/power for the races I do-- eg an oly tri the bike leg a certain percentage of your FTP is recommended to have the best overall results, just a target to shoot for depending on how the day goes. Given that I only race those about ~2x/yr it puts me in the range I need to be more accurately IMO |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I just don't care personally, but test away. Did you ever do an 800m race? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
no lol but I might this summer. $20 says I dont come anywhere near/close to your speed and a further $20 says your wife easily has me covered too! Like my goals this summer for the 400/800/mile series are: 1:14/2:42/6:00 or whatever a 6:00/mi works out to going backwards |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
i hate the ftp test. hate. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: stickaz no lol but I might this summer. $20 says I dont come anywhere near/close to your speed and a further $20 says your wife easily has me covered too! Like my goals this summer for the 400/800/mile series are: 1:14/2:42/6:00 or whatever a 6:00/mi works out to going backwards *searches for a track nearby* I might commit for 2 weeks and then give up, like everything running related tho. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The quest for <6 minute miles among middle age men? IN |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
yisss btw: 322w/305w result just touched 160 HR right at the end which is actually right around what I seem to do in a 5K heh $1_hr_ftp_test=($1hr_ftp_test)+29 = right at the median of cat 3 rating ~1 minute spent in zone 5! woo! lol note: minutes 17-37 are right around the actual FTP test, the earlier stuff are warmup intervals I basically avg'd 154-155 HR for the entire thing [20m], I dont think I left much on the table, had a couple moments where I had to back off a bit to rally lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'll allow it. I'm not a snob, I just don't see the point in obsessing over numbers if you're just gonna puss out any time the effort gets uncomfortable. Originally Posted By: stickaz I just think he's a [closet?] dataphobe snob. Eg look how fast I am, I dont need to monitor any data [so you shouldnt either]. Hasn't gone out and said it yet but I figure I might as well throw it out there and stop the waiting! For me personally, it helps me set/guess/estimate the planned speed/power for the races I do-- eg an oly tri the bike leg a certain percentage of your FTP is recommended to have the best overall results, just a target to shoot for depending on how the day goes. Given that I only race those about ~2x/yr it puts me in the range I need to be more accurately IMO |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
it's a process :p 1 minute in zone 5 just now is about 1 minute longer than I spent in it last week! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
This is pretty gross - Buy this Amazon - Sweat mat |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Fuck that!one more thing to clean. I just towel it up and burn the towel lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Fastest cat 3 racer who doesn't race? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'll probably join the cat5s up Hamilton this year Also one of the reasons I started doing tris was to have actual TT bike splits, 2 more next month for this non-racer, adding to the 2 I've already done this year |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Starting to get triggered |