#6336608 - 05/11/12 09:37 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
Eddie_82
miataist
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 38130
Loc: Ca�ada
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6336902 - 05/12/12 07:19 AM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
24-70mm is the easy choice.. Fuck the ver II of that lens as well, lol.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337081 - 05/12/12 12:21 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
BobBarker
BobBarker
Unregistered
|
buy 24-70 and our balls will touch
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337257 - 05/12/12 03:40 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: ]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
buy 24-70 and our balls will touch
Hopefully borrowing one for my trip next week, if it's as razor sharp as yours I'll pick one up
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337466 - 05/12/12 06:29 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
You really don't need IS, my 70-200 f4L doesn't have it and I've taken some wicked sharp pics with it..
My 10-22mm doesn't have it either 
Not something I'm personally worried about to be honest.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337479 - 05/12/12 06:36 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
BobBarker
BobBarker
Unregistered
|
buy 24-70 and our balls will touch  See, my reservation about that is the lack of IS. I feel like im about as steady as michael j fox sometimes, so I worry how my pictures would come out without the IS. That's why I like the idea of the second gen, until I realize that the lens that seems to do everything I want is so far outside any fantasy of a camera budget for any foreseeable future lol. At least with lenses that run 1k~ (new or a little used) I can kinda pretend I'll have that much for a lens at some point.
keep shutter speed above 1/60 if handheld...otherwise, use tripod
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337481 - 05/12/12 06:37 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: ]
|
BobBarker
BobBarker
Unregistered
|
My 70-200, with IS....now that fucker I can shoot sharp, handheld, down to 1/15.
It's amazing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337493 - 05/12/12 06:49 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
Huggy
Mr. Sour Pants
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 44728
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
You really don't need IS, my 70-200 f4L doesn't have it and I've taken some wicked sharp pics with it.. My 10-22mm doesn't have it either  Not something I'm personally worried about to be honest.
No IS doesn't mean squat taking pictures of fish outside... Now go take a picture of them fish in a dark setting and tell me how the no IS works for you...
IS greatly helps when you get into low light settings.
As BobBarker said, with my 70-200 2.8 IS II I can shoot 1/15sec handheld.
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337516 - 05/12/12 07:12 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: Huggy]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
I need to start shooting more indoor porn I think 
(Remind me never to shoot a 70-200 f2.8, I'll most likely hate my f4L after that )
Oh yeah, picking up 24-70mm tomorrow (borrowing, not buying) can't fucking wait to try it out!
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337553 - 05/12/12 07:54 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
Huggy
Mr. Sour Pants
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 44728
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
I need to start shooting more indoor porn I think  (Remind me never to shoot a 70-200 f2.8, I'll most likely hate my f4L after that  ) Oh yeah, picking up 24-70mm tomorrow (borrowing, not buying) can't fucking wait to try it out!
The F4 70-200 takes amazing pictures so I wouldn't fret it... yet... But yeah, the 2.8 70-200 is just, well, in a league of it's own really.
And the 24-70 is my next lens.
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337567 - 05/12/12 08:07 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: Huggy]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
I need something LOONG for my trip in August. I might be able to borrow a 100-400mm as well, lol.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337604 - 05/12/12 08:35 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
Huggy
Mr. Sour Pants
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 44728
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
I need something LOONG for my trip in August. I might be able to borrow a 100-400mm as well, lol.
Do it!!! I <3 my 100-400. It's not quite up to the 70-200 2.8 IS II in speed but I like it more. The push-pull zoom is fucking awesome and the reach of it is just spectacular...
Another big difference is I just can't take a bad picture with my 70-200, while on the 100-400 I have to just be a little careful...
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337607 - 05/12/12 08:36 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: Huggy]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
Dude, I know you love your 100-400mm why do you think I'm so hesitant to use one? 
STOP MAKING ME SPEND MONEY!
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337629 - 05/12/12 08:45 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
Huggy
Mr. Sour Pants
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 44728
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
Dude, I know you love your 100-400mm why do you think I'm so hesitant to use one?  STOP MAKING ME SPEND MONEY! 
You can't take that money to the grave. Enjoy life while you live! And if you can't borrow a 100-400 for your trip, let me know and I'll let you borrow mine.
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337656 - 05/12/12 09:06 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: Huggy]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
I appreciate it man.. The one thing I do like about good glass is that you rarely have a problem with getting a very good chunk of your initial investment back if you sell it.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6337968 - 05/13/12 02:54 AM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
Did you send this question into the TWIP podcast? Was asked this week. Was a split response, but it depended on what you were doing with it. Most votes went to the 2.8 it seemed like. But, Don Juan Pons and Rick Sammon love the 24-120 and I've heard it's crazy sharp.
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6338044 - 05/13/12 08:45 AM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: chef]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
I thought the 24-70mm was pretty much the sharpest of them all (not including primes)??
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6338072 - 05/13/12 09:47 AM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: chef]
|
NOT spotch...
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
|
Did you send this question into the TWIP podcast? Was asked this week. Was a split response, but it depended on what you were doing with it. Most votes went to the 2.8 it seemed like. But, Don Juan Pons and Rick Sammon love the 24-120 and I've heard it's crazy sharp.
No, I've actually never heard of the TWIP podcast before. Sounds like I should probably download that episode though lol
_________________________
"On the street where there is no lap timer, feel is all that matters" - scootergeek "A bunch of nerdy douchebags chasing a ghost." -Ob1 on bitcoin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6338654 - 05/13/12 08:04 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
This Week in Photo, pretty good. Mostly just round table discussion about the weeks news. They touch on a couple of listener questions, and each suggest a photo related product. Book, accessory, whatever. Good way to kill some time on the commute.
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6340489 - 05/14/12 03:16 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: MetalheaD]
|
tylerdurden
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 25966
Loc: Shyea, like I'm telling you
|
I'm kinda hoping the Tamron 24-70 is all it's cracked up to be. I'd bet it goes for under $1K street before the end of the year and it has IS. I've heard the bokeh is a little harsh in some circumstances due to how the aspheric elements are formed, but those also help with edge sharpness, so . . .
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6341115 - 05/14/12 07:52 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: tylerdurden]
|
NOT spotch...
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
|
I'm kinda hoping the Tamron 24-70 is all it's cracked up to be. I'd bet it goes for under $1K street before the end of the year and it has IS. I've heard the bokeh is a little harsh in some circumstances due to how the aspheric elements are formed, but those also help with edge sharpness, so . . .
Interesting....
_________________________
"On the street where there is no lap timer, feel is all that matters" - scootergeek "A bunch of nerdy douchebags chasing a ghost." -Ob1 on bitcoin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6343547 - 05/15/12 09:17 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
Simon_the_Pieman
Post Master Sr
Registered: 08/13/01
Posts: 9524
Loc: The A
|
I need to start shooting more indoor porn I think  (Remind me never to shoot a 70-200 f2.8, I'll most likely hate my f4L after that  ) Oh yeah, picking up 24-70mm tomorrow (borrowing, not buying) can't fucking wait to try it out!
lets do it.
http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/tor/pho/2977195121.html
_________________________
"I'd love it if we did it... but I guess I'm a big skeptic on Canadians because so many are retarded as fuck." - 355-Si, 2020
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6343650 - 05/15/12 10:19 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: Simon_the_Pieman]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
Dude, I'll be the actor!
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6343697 - 05/15/12 10:39 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
BobBarker
BobBarker
Unregistered
|
wait, so did you try the 24-70 yet, Bill?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6345078 - 05/16/12 02:37 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: ]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108748
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
wait, so did you try the 24-70 yet, Bill?
Yeah, I've got some indoor shots with it... Fishing trip is next week, it will be on my 60D permanently while in the boat! Can't fucking wait!
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6350002 - 05/18/12 05:00 PM
Re: Which of these two Canon lenses is better?
[Re: NOT spotch...]
|
Nate047
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 28558
Loc: La La Land, CA
|
24-105 is sharper, 24-70 is faster. Neither is "better" because both have issues. I have the 24-105 and it's okay.
Nate
_________________________
natehasslerphoto.comFlickrFacebook"Nate047 > NateSTL" - TenTwelve "As long as I have a face, you'll always have a place to sit." - SlowBlackCar *insert picture of stock Fit here*
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: jsmonet, x, 2000SiRacer, The Mad Paki
|
Civic Type-R 2-Piece Rotors — $814 Front Pair! Made in England!
View EBC Rotors
ClubSi.com Shirts
|
|
|